e10vq
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One)
|
|
|
þ |
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the quarterly period ended January 1, 2010.
OR
|
|
|
o |
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934. |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number (0-21767)
ViaSat, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|
|
Delaware
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
|
|
33-0174996
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.) |
6155 El Camino Real
Carlsbad, California 92009
(760) 476-2200
(Address of principal executive offices and telephone number)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Large accelerated filer þ |
|
Accelerated filer o |
|
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
|
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
The number of shares outstanding of the registrants common stock, $0.0001 par value, as of
February 5, 2010 was 36,316,906.
VIASAT, INC.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements (Unaudited)
VIASAT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As of |
|
|
As of |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
$ |
67,116 |
|
|
$ |
63,491 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
|
2,148 |
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable, net |
|
|
185,601 |
|
|
|
164,106 |
|
Inventories |
|
|
80,173 |
|
|
|
65,562 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
38,218 |
|
|
|
26,724 |
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
|
|
21,532 |
|
|
|
18,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current assets |
|
|
394,788 |
|
|
|
338,824 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment and satellites, net |
|
|
612,331 |
|
|
|
170,225 |
|
Other acquired intangible assets, net |
|
|
93,957 |
|
|
|
16,655 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
74,062 |
|
|
|
65,429 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
78,893 |
|
|
|
31,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,254,031 |
|
|
$ |
622,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable |
|
$ |
67,022 |
|
|
$ |
63,397 |
|
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
100,221 |
|
|
|
72,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total current liabilities |
|
|
167,243 |
|
|
|
135,434 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Line of credit |
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt, net |
|
|
271,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other liabilities |
|
|
31,251 |
|
|
|
24,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
|
|
610,171 |
|
|
|
160,152 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 9) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders equity: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ViaSat, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock |
|
|
4 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Paid-in capital |
|
|
435,375 |
|
|
|
273,102 |
|
Retained earnings |
|
|
208,161 |
|
|
|
187,471 |
|
Common stock held in treasury |
|
|
(3,998 |
) |
|
|
(1,701 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) |
|
|
519 |
|
|
|
(127 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total ViaSat, Inc. stockholders equity |
|
|
640,061 |
|
|
|
458,748 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interest in subsidiary |
|
|
3,799 |
|
|
|
4,042 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total stockholders equity |
|
|
643,860 |
|
|
|
462,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
|
$ |
1,254,031 |
|
|
$ |
622,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
3
VIASAT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2009 |
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands, except per share data) |
|
Revenues: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues |
|
$ |
137,146 |
|
|
$ |
141,157 |
|
|
$ |
437,889 |
|
|
$ |
436,972 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
19,218 |
|
|
|
9,205 |
|
|
|
37,549 |
|
|
|
25,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
|
156,364 |
|
|
|
150,362 |
|
|
|
475,438 |
|
|
|
462,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenues |
|
|
98,708 |
|
|
|
100,786 |
|
|
|
309,105 |
|
|
|
312,675 |
|
Cost of service revenues |
|
|
11,613 |
|
|
|
4,743 |
|
|
|
24,585 |
|
|
|
16,425 |
|
Selling, general and administrative |
|
|
34,416 |
|
|
|
23,952 |
|
|
|
90,259 |
|
|
|
72,986 |
|
Independent research and development |
|
|
7,864 |
|
|
|
6,985 |
|
|
|
21,559 |
|
|
|
23,481 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangible assets |
|
|
1,901 |
|
|
|
2,337 |
|
|
|
4,768 |
|
|
|
7,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
1,862 |
|
|
|
11,559 |
|
|
|
25,162 |
|
|
|
30,019 |
|
Other income (expense): |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income |
|
|
382 |
|
|
|
97 |
|
|
|
580 |
|
|
|
1,390 |
|
Interest expense |
|
|
(2,121 |
) |
|
|
(116 |
) |
|
|
(2,530 |
) |
|
|
(316 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
123 |
|
|
|
11,540 |
|
|
|
23,212 |
|
|
|
31,093 |
|
(Benefit) provision for income taxes |
|
|
(2,940 |
) |
|
|
914 |
|
|
|
2,765 |
|
|
|
4,822 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
|
3,063 |
|
|
|
10,626 |
|
|
|
20,447 |
|
|
|
26,271 |
|
Less: Net (loss) income attributable to the
noncontrolling interest, net of tax |
|
|
(183 |
) |
|
|
(40 |
) |
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ViaSat, Inc. |
|
$ |
3,246 |
|
|
$ |
10,666 |
|
|
$ |
20,690 |
|
|
$ |
26,215 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share attributable to ViaSat,
Inc. common stockholders |
|
$ |
.10 |
|
|
$ |
.35 |
|
|
$ |
.65 |
|
|
$ |
.85 |
|
Diluted net income per share attributable to ViaSat,
Inc. common stockholders |
|
$ |
.09 |
|
|
$ |
.34 |
|
|
$ |
.62 |
|
|
$ |
.82 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing basic net income per share |
|
|
32,777 |
|
|
|
30,836 |
|
|
|
31,863 |
|
|
|
30,699 |
|
Shares used in computing diluted net income per share |
|
|
34,725 |
|
|
|
31,699 |
|
|
|
33,591 |
|
|
|
31,826 |
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
4
VIASAT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Cash flows from operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income |
|
$ |
20,447 |
|
|
$ |
26,271 |
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation |
|
|
17,432 |
|
|
|
13,744 |
|
Amortization of intangible assets |
|
|
4,820 |
|
|
|
8,143 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
(5,273 |
) |
|
|
(2,181 |
) |
Stock compensation expense |
|
|
8,412 |
|
|
|
7,581 |
|
Other non-cash adjustments |
|
|
(204 |
) |
|
|
95 |
|
Increase (decrease) in cash resulting from changes in operating assets and liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable |
|
|
(9,953 |
) |
|
|
(10,945 |
) |
Inventories |
|
|
(6,580 |
) |
|
|
(2,178 |
) |
Other assets |
|
|
5,360 |
|
|
|
(4,886 |
) |
Accounts payable |
|
|
7,750 |
|
|
|
(3,069 |
) |
Accrued liabilities |
|
|
16,288 |
|
|
|
(2,526 |
) |
Other liabilities |
|
|
(636 |
) |
|
|
1,403 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by operating activities |
|
|
57,863 |
|
|
|
31,452 |
|
Cash flows from investing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property, equipment and satellites |
|
|
(85,429 |
) |
|
|
(90,712 |
) |
Payments related to acquisition of businesses, net of cash acquired |
|
|
(377,987 |
) |
|
|
(925 |
) |
Change in restricted cash, net |
|
|
5,150 |
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for patents, licenses and other assets |
|
|
(10,004 |
) |
|
|
(2,225 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities |
|
|
(468,270 |
) |
|
|
(93,862 |
) |
Cash flows from financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt, net of discount |
|
|
271,582 |
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from line of credit borrowings |
|
|
263,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Payments on line of credit |
|
|
(123,000 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Payment of debt issuance costs |
|
|
(11,598 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
|
|
14,764 |
|
|
|
5,333 |
|
Purchase of common stock in treasury |
|
|
(2,297 |
) |
|
|
(660 |
) |
Payment on secured borrowing |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(4,720 |
) |
Proceeds from sale of stock of majority-owned subsidiary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,500 |
|
Incremental tax benefits from stock-based compensation |
|
|
1,104 |
|
|
|
191 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities |
|
|
413,555 |
|
|
|
1,644 |
|
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
|
|
477 |
|
|
|
(699 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents |
|
|
3,625 |
|
|
|
(61,465 |
) |
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
|
|
63,491 |
|
|
|
125,176 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
|
$ |
67,116 |
|
|
$ |
63,711 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with acquisition |
|
$ |
131,888 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock in satisfaction of certain accrued employee compensation liabilities |
|
$ |
5,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of common stock in connection with license right obtained |
|
$ |
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
5
VIASAT, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
(In thousands, except share data)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ViaSat, Inc. Stockholders |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
Accumulated |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
in Treasury |
|
|
Other |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Paid-in |
|
|
Retained |
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
Noncontrolling |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive |
|
|
|
Shares Issued |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Capital |
|
|
Earnings |
|
|
Shares |
|
|
Amount |
|
|
Income (Loss) |
|
|
Interest |
|
|
Total |
|
|
Income |
|
Balance at
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
31,114,086 |
|
|
$ |
3 |
|
|
$ |
273,102 |
|
|
$ |
187,471 |
|
|
|
(66,968 |
) |
|
$ |
(1,701 |
) |
|
$ |
(127 |
) |
|
$ |
4,042 |
|
|
$ |
462,790 |
|
|
|
|
|
Exercise of stock
options |
|
|
617,224 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
11,114 |
|
|
|
|
|
Tax benefit from
exercise of stock
options and release
of restricted stock
unit (RSU) awards |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,067 |
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of stock
under Employee
Stock Purchase Plan |
|
|
168,640 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,650 |
|
|
|
|
|
Stock-based
compensation
expense |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued in
settlement of
certain accrued
employee
compensation
liabilities |
|
|
192,894 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
RSU awards vesting |
|
|
231,412 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of
treasury shares
pursuant to vesting
of certain RSU
agreements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(87,408 |
) |
|
|
(2,297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2,297 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Shares issued in
connection with
acquisition of
business, net of
issuance costs |
|
|
4,286,250 |
|
|
|
1 |
|
|
|
131,637 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
131,638 |
|
|
|
|
|
Shares issued in
connection with
license right
obtained |
|
|
10,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
303 |
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20,690 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(243 |
) |
|
|
20,447 |
|
|
$ |
20,447 |
|
Foreign currency
translation, net of
tax |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
646 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Comprehensive income |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,093 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at January
1, 2010 |
|
|
36,620,506 |
|
|
$ |
4 |
|
|
$ |
435,375 |
|
|
$ |
208,161 |
|
|
|
(154,376 |
) |
|
$ |
(3,998 |
) |
|
$ |
519 |
|
|
$ |
3,799 |
|
|
$ |
643,860 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.
6
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 1 Basis of Presentation
The accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet at January 1, 2010, the condensed
consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine months ended January 1, 2010 and
January 2, 2009, the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the nine months ended
January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, and the condensed consolidated statement of stockholders
equity and comprehensive income for the nine months ended January 1, 2010 have been prepared by the
management of ViaSat, Inc. (the Company), and have not been audited. These financial statements
have been prepared on the same basis as the audited consolidated financial statements for the
fiscal year ended April 3, 2009 and, in the opinion of management, include all adjustments
(consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary for a fair statement of the financial
position, results of operations and cash flows for all periods presented. These financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto for the
fiscal year ended April 3, 2009 included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K. Interim
operating results are not necessarily indicative of operating results for the full year. The
year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements,
but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (GAAP).
The Companys condensed consolidated financial statements include the assets, liabilities and
results of operations of TrellisWare Technologies, Inc. (TrellisWare), a majority-owned subsidiary
of ViaSat. All significant intercompany amounts have been eliminated.
The Companys fiscal year is the 52 or 53 weeks ending on the Friday closest to March 31 of
the specified year. For example, references to fiscal year 2010 refer to the fiscal year ending on
April 2, 2010. The Companys quarters for fiscal year 2010 end on July 3, 2009, October 2, 2009,
January 1, 2010 and April 2, 2010. This results in a 53 week fiscal year approximately every four
to five years. Fiscal year 2010 is a 52 week year, compared with a 53 week year in fiscal year
2009. As a result of the shift in the fiscal calendar, the second quarter of fiscal year 2009
included an additional week. The Company does not believe that the extra week results in any
material impact on its financial results.
During the Companys third quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company completed the acquisition
of WildBlue Holding, Inc., a privately held Delaware corporation (WildBlue) (see Note 11). The
acquisition was accounted for as a purchase and accordingly, the condensed consolidated financial
statements include the operating results of WildBlue from the date of acquisition.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and reported amounts of revenues and expenses
during the reporting period. Estimates have been prepared on the basis of the most current and best
available information and actual results could differ from those estimates. Significant estimates
made by management include revenue recognition, stock-based compensation, self-insurance reserves,
allowance for doubtful accounts, warranty accrual, valuation of goodwill and other intangible
assets, patents, orbital slots and orbital licenses, software development, property, equipment and
satellites, long-lived assets, income taxes and valuation allowance on deferred tax assets.
The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) has issued authoritative guidance on the
Codification (Statements of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 168 (SFAS 168), FASB
Accounting Standards CodificationTM and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted
Accounting Principles / ASC 105). The authoritative guidance on the Codification (SFAS 168 / ASC
105) establishes the FASB Accounting Standards CodificationTM (Codification
or ASC) as the single source of GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental
entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under
authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants.
The Codification supersedes all existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other
non-grandfathered, non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become
non-authoritative. Following the Codification, the FASB will not issue new standards in the form of
Statements, FASB Staff Positions or Emerging Issues Task Force Abstracts. Instead, it will issue
Accounting Standards Updates, which will serve to update the Codification, provide background
information about the guidance and provide the basis for conclusions on the changes to the
Codification. GAAP is not intended to be changed as a result of the FASBs Codification project,
but it will
7
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
change the way the guidance is organized and presented. As a result, these changes will have a
significant impact on how companies reference GAAP in their financial statements and in their
accounting policies for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after
September 15, 2009. The Company has implemented the Codification in this quarterly report, and has
provided references to the Codification topics alongside references to the existing standards.
On April 4, 2009, the beginning of the Companys first quarter of fiscal year 2010, the
Company adopted the authoritative guidance for noncontrolling interests (SFAS 160, Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements an amendment of ARB No. 51 / ASC 810-10-65-1).
The Company adopted the authoritative guidance for noncontrolling interests on a prospective basis,
except for the presentation and disclosure requirements which were applied retrospectively for all
periods presented. As a result, the Company reclassified to noncontrolling interest, a component of
stockholders equity, which was previously reported as minority interest in consolidated subsidiary
in the mezzanine section of the Companys condensed consolidated balance sheets and reported as a
separate caption within the Companys condensed consolidated statements of operations, net income
including noncontrolling interest, net income attributable to the noncontrolling interest, and net
income attributable to ViaSat, Inc. In addition, the Company utilized net income including
noncontrolling interest as the starting point on the Companys condensed consolidated statements of
cash flows in order to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities, rather
than beginning with net income, which was previously exclusive of the noncontrolling interest.
These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported consolidated income from operations,
net income attributable to ViaSat, Inc. or net cash provided by operating activities. Also, net
income per share continues to be based on net income attributable to ViaSat, Inc.
In December 2007, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for business combinations (SFAS 141R,
Business Combinations / ASC 805). The purpose of issuing the statement is to better represent the
economic value of a business combination transaction. The changes effected with the authoritative
guidance for business combinations from the previous guidance include, but are not limited to: (1)
acquisition costs will be recognized as expenses separately from the acquisition; (2) known
contractual contingencies at the time of the acquisition will be considered part of the liabilities
acquired measured at their fair value; all other contingencies will be part of the liabilities
acquired measured at their fair value only if it is more likely than not that they meet the
definition of a liability; (3) contingent consideration based on the outcome of future events will
be recognized and measured at the time of the acquisition; (4) business combinations achieved in
stages (step acquisitions) will need to recognize the identifiable assets and liabilities, as well
as non-controlling interests, in the acquiree, at the full amounts of their fair values; and (5) a
bargain purchase (defined as a business combination in which the total acquisition-date fair value
of the identifiable net assets acquired exceeds the fair value of the consideration transferred
plus any non-controlling interest in the acquiree) will require that excess to be recognized as a
gain attributable to the acquirer. The authoritative guidance for business combinations became
effective for the Company as of the beginning of fiscal year 2010. The guidance applies
prospectively to business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after April 4, 2009,
except that resolution of certain tax contingencies and adjustments to valuation allowances related
to business combinations, which previously were adjusted to goodwill, will be adjusted to income
tax expense for all such adjustments after April 4, 2009, regardless of the date of the original
business combination. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal year 2010.
In accordance with this guidance, the Company recognized $4.6 million and $7.1 million in
transaction expenses related to the acquisition of WildBlue (see Note 11 for a discussion of the
WildBlue acquisition) in its condensed consolidated statements of operations for the three and nine
months ended January 1, 2010, respectively.
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the time of filing this Form 10-Q with the
SEC on February 10, 2010. See to Note 15 for a discussion of subsequent events.
Restricted cash
As a result of the WildBlue acquisition, the Company acquired restricted cash used to
collateralize certain letters of credit. In addition, certain of WildBlues employment agreements
require the Company to restrict cash to fund severance obligations that would be triggered upon
termination of certain WildBlue key employees. These amounts are deposited in accounts that
restrict the use of such cash for purposes other than discharging the related obligations. As such,
these amounts have been classified as restricted cash on the Companys condensed consolidated
balance sheets. Restricted cash is classified as noncurrent where the restriction expires in more
than one year. The Company had $2.1 million of restricted cash classified as a current asset as of
January 1, 2010, compared to no restricted cash as of April 3, 2009.
8
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Property, equipment and satellites
Equipment, computers and software, furniture and fixtures and the Companys satellite under
construction are recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. The Company generally computes
depreciation using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging
from two to eleven years. Leasehold improvements are capitalized and amortized using the
straight-line method over the shorter of the lease term or the life of the improvement. Additions
to property, equipment and satellites, together with major renewals and betterments, are
capitalized. Maintenance, repairs and minor renewals and betterments are charged to expense. When
assets are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation or
amortization are removed from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is recognized.
Satellite construction costs, including launch services and insurance, are generally procured
under long-term contracts that provide for payments over the contract periods and are capitalized
as incurred. In addition, interest expense is capitalized on the carrying value of the satellite
during the construction period. With respect to ViaSat-1, the Companys high-capacity satellite
currently under construction, the Company capitalized $3.8 million and $5.0 million of interest
expense during the three and nine months ended January 1, 2010, respectively. No interest expense
was capitalized during the same periods last fiscal year.
As a result of the acquisition of WildBlue on December 15, 2009 (see Note 11), the Company
acquired the WildBlue-1 satellite (which was placed into service in March 2007) and an exclusive
prepaid lifetime capital lease of Ka-band capacity on Telesat Canadas Anik F2 satellite (which was
placed into service in April 2005). The acquired assets also included the indoor and outdoor
customer premise equipment (CPE) units leased to subscribers under WildBlues retail leasing
program. The Company depreciates the cost of CPE and associated installation costs over its
estimated useful life.
Patents, orbital slots and orbital licenses
The Company capitalizes the costs of obtaining or acquiring patents, orbital slots and orbital
licenses. Amortization of intangible assets that have finite lives is provided for by the
straight-line method over the shorter of the legal or estimated economic life. The Company
capitalized $3.0 million and $1.8 million of costs related to patents, which are included in other
assets as of January 1, 2010 and April 3, 2009, respectively. Accumulated amortization related to
these patents was $0.2 million as of January 1, 2010 and April 3, 2009. Amortization expense
related to these patents was less than $0.1 million for the three months ended January 1, 2010 and
January 2, 2009, and less than $0.1 million for the nine months ended January 1, 2010 and January
2, 2009. The Company also capitalized $4.4 million and $2.6 million of costs in other assets as of
January 1, 2010 and April 3, 2009, respectively, related to orbital slots and orbital licenses that
have not yet been placed into service. If a patent, orbital slot or orbital license is rejected,
abandoned or otherwise invalidated, the unamortized cost is expensed in that period. During the
three and nine months ended January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, the Company did not write off any
costs due to abandonment or impairment.
Debt issuance costs
Debt issuance costs are amortized and recognized as interest expense on a straight-line basis
over the expected term of the related debt as the amounts are not materially different from the
effective interest rate basis. During the three and nine months ended January 1, 2010, the Company
paid and capitalized approximately $8.5 million and $11.3 million, respectively, in debt issuance
costs related to the Companys 8.875% Senior Notes due 2016 (the Notes) and additional debt
issuance costs related to the Companys revolving credit facility (the Credit Facility). During the
three and nine months ended January 2, 2009, the Company paid and capitalized no material amounts
in debt issuance costs related to the Credit Facility. Unamortized debt issuance costs short-term
are recorded in prepaid expenses and other current assets and long-term in other assets in the
condensed consolidated balance sheets.
Software development
Costs of developing software for sale are charged to research and development expense when
incurred, until technological feasibility has been established. Software development costs incurred
from the time technological feasibility is reached until the product is available for general
release to customers are capitalized and reported at the lower of unamortized cost or net
realizable value. Once the product is available for general release, the software development costs
are amortized based on the ratio of current to future revenue for each product with an annual
minimum equal to straight-line amortization over the remaining estimated economic life of the
product not to exceed five years. The Company capitalized $2.3 million and $5.3 million of costs
related to software developed for resale for the three and nine months ended January 1, 2010,
respectively. The Company capitalized $0.2 million and
9
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
$0.4 million related to software development for resale for the three and nine months ended
January 2, 2009, respectively. There was no amortization expense of software development costs for
the three and nine months ended January 1, 2010. The amortization expense of software development
costs was $0.1 million and $1.1 million for the three and nine months ended January 2, 2009,
respectively.
Self-insurance liabilities
The Company has a self-insurance plan to retain a portion of the exposure for losses related
to employee medical benefits. The Company also has a self-insurance plan for a portion of the
exposure for losses related to workers compensation costs. The self-insurance policies provide for
both specific and aggregate stop-loss limits. The Company utilizes internal actuarial methods, as
well as other historical information for the purpose of estimating ultimate costs for a particular
policy year. Based on these actuarial methods, along with currently available information and
insurance industry statistics, the balance on the Companys self-insurance liability was $1.5
million and $1.4 million as of January 1, 2010 and April 3, 2009, respectively. The Companys
estimate, which is subject to inherent variability, is based on average claims experience in the
Companys industry and its own experience in terms of frequency and severity of claims, including
asserted and unasserted claims incurred but not reported, with no explicit provision for adverse
fluctuation from year to year. This variability may lead to ultimate payments being either greater
or less than the amounts presented above. Self-insurance liabilities have been classified as
current in accordance with the estimated timing of the projected payments.
Secured borrowings
Occasionally, the Company enters into secured borrowing arrangements in connection with
customer financing in order to provide additional sources of funding. As of January 1, 2010 and
April 3, 2009, the Company had no secured borrowing arrangements with customers. In the first
quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company paid all obligations related to its secured borrowing,
under which the Company pledged a note receivable from a customer to serve as collateral for the
obligation under the borrowing arrangement, totaling $4.7 million plus accrued interest.
During fiscal year 2008, due to the customers payment default under the note receivable, the
Company wrote down the note receivable by approximately $5.3 million related to the principal and
interest accrued to date. During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009, the Company entered into
certain agreements with the note receivable insurance carrier providing the Company approximately
$1.7 million in cash payments and recorded a current asset of approximately $1.7 million and a
long-term asset of approximately $1.5 million as of April 3, 2009. Pursuant to these agreements,
the Company received an additional cash payment of $1.3 million during the first nine months of
fiscal year 2010 and as of January 1, 2010 recorded a current asset of approximately $1.1 million
and a long-term asset of approximately $1.0 million.
Indemnification provisions
In the ordinary course of business, the Company includes indemnification provisions in certain
of its contracts, generally relating to parties with which the Company has commercial relations.
Pursuant to these agreements, the Company will indemnify, hold harmless and agree to reimburse the
indemnified party for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified party, including but not
limited to losses relating to third-party intellectual property claims. To date, there have not
been any costs incurred in connection with such indemnification clauses. The Companys insurance
policies do not necessarily cover the cost of defending indemnification claims or providing
indemnification, so if a claim was filed against the Company by any party the Company has agreed to
indemnify, the Company could incur substantial legal costs and damages. A claim would be accrued
when a loss is considered probable and the amount can be reasonably estimated. At January 1, 2010
and April 3, 2009, no such amounts were accrued.
Simultaneously with the execution of the merger agreement relating to the acquisition of
WildBlue, the Company entered into an indemnification agreement dated September 30, 2009 with
several of the former stockholders of WildBlue pursuant to which such former stockholders agreed to
indemnify the Company for costs which result from, relate to or arise out of potential claims and
liabilities under various WildBlue contracts, an existing appraisal action regarding WildBlues
2008 recapitalization, certain rights to acquire securities of WildBlue and a severance agreement.
The Company determined the fair value of the indemnification agreement in accordance with the
authoritative guidance for business combinations and has recorded a liability of $0.5 million in
the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2010 as an element of accrued
liabilities.
10
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Noncontrolling interest
A noncontrolling interest, previously referred to as minority interest, represents the equity
interest in a subsidiary that is not attributable, either directly or indirectly, to the Company
and is reported as equity of the Company, separately from the Companys controlling interest.
Revenues, expenses, gains, losses, net income or loss and other comprehensive income are reported
in the condensed consolidated financial statements at the consolidated amounts, which include the
amounts attributable to both the controlling and noncontrolling interest.
In April 2008, the Companys majority-owned subsidiary, TrellisWare, issued additional shares
of preferred stock in which the Company invested $1.8 million in order to retain a constant
ownership interest. As a result of the transaction, TrellisWare also received $1.5 million in cash
proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock to its other principal stockholders.
Common stock held in treasury
During the first nine months of fiscal year 2010 and during fiscal year 2009, the Company
delivered 231,412 and 93,006 shares of common stock, respectively, based on the vesting terms of
certain restricted stock unit agreements. In order for employees to satisfy minimum statutory
employee tax withholding requirements related to the delivery of common stock underlying these
restricted stock unit agreements, the Company repurchased 87,408 and 33,350 shares of common stock
with a total value of $2.3 million and $0.7 million during the first nine months of fiscal year
2010 and during fiscal year 2009, respectively. Repurchased shares of common stock of 154,376 and
66,968 were held in treasury as of January 1, 2010 and April 3, 2009, respectively.
Derivatives
The Company enters into foreign currency forward and option contracts from time to time to
hedge certain forecasted foreign currency transactions. Gains and losses arising from foreign
currency forward and option contracts not designated as hedging instruments are recorded in
interest income (expense) as gains (losses) on derivative instruments. Gains and losses arising
from the effective portion of foreign currency forward and option contracts that are designated as
cash-flow hedging instruments are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) as
unrealized gains (losses) on derivative instruments until the underlying transaction affects the
Companys earnings, at which time they are then recorded in the same income statement line as the
underlying transaction.
During the three and nine months ended January 1, 2010, the Company did not settle any foreign
exchange contracts; therefore, there were no realized gains or losses during the three and nine
months ended January 1, 2010 related to derivative instruments. During the three months ended
January 2, 2009, the Company did not settle any foreign exchange contracts; therefore, there were
no realized gains or losses during the three months ended January 2, 2009 related to derivative
instruments. During the nine months ended January 2, 2009, the Company settled certain foreign
exchange contracts and in connection therewith recognized a loss of approximately $0.3 million,
recorded in cost of revenues based on the nature of the underlying transactions. The Company had no
foreign currency forward contracts outstanding as of January 1, 2010 or April 3, 2009.
Stock-based payments
The Company records compensation expense associated with stock options, restricted stock unit
awards and other stock-based compensation in accordance with the authoritative guidance for
share-based payments (SFAS 123R, Share-Based Payment / ASC 718). The Company recognizes these
compensation costs on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period of the award. The
Company recognized $3.3 million and $8.4 million of stock-based compensation expense for the three
and nine months ended January 1, 2010, respectively, and $2.5 million and $7.6 million of
stock-based compensation expense for the three and nine months ended January 2, 2009, respectively.
The Company recorded incremental tax benefits from stock options exercised and restricted
stock unit awards vesting of $1.1 million and $0.2 million for the nine months ended January 1,
2010 and January 2, 2009, respectively, which are classified as part of cash flows from financing
activities in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows.
11
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Income taxes
Accruals for uncertain tax positions are provided for in accordance with the authoritative
guidance for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes (FASB Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48),
Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 / ASC
740). The Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more
likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities,
based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial
statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater
than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The authoritative guidance for
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes also provides guidance on derecognition of income tax
assets and liabilities, classification of current and deferred income tax assets and liabilities,
accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax positions, and income tax disclosures.
Current income tax expense is the amount of income taxes expected to be payable for the
current year. A deferred income tax asset or liability is established for the expected future tax
consequences resulting from differences in the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and
liabilities and for the expected future tax benefit to be derived from tax credit and loss
carryforwards. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of
management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not
be realized. Deferred income tax expense (benefit) is the net change during the year in the
deferred income tax asset or liability.
Recent authoritative guidance
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which amends the consolidation guidance
applicable to variable interest entities (SFAS 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46R).
The guidance will affect the overall consolidation analysis under the current authoritative
guidance for consolidation of variable interest entities (FIN 46R / ASC 810) and is effective for
the Company as of the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact that the guidance may have on its consolidated financial statements and
disclosures.
In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for revenue recognition with multiple
deliverables (EITF 08-1, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables). This new guidance
impacts the determination of when the individual deliverables included in a multiple-element
arrangement may be treated as separate units of accounting. Additionally, this guidance modifies
the manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated across the separately identified
deliverables by no longer permitting the residual method of allocating arrangement consideration.
This guidance will be effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012,
however early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the
guidance may have on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
Note 2 Revenue Recognition
A substantial portion of the Companys revenues are derived from long-term contracts requiring
development and delivery of complex equipment built to customer specifications. Sales related to
long-term contracts are accounted for under authoritative guidance for the percentage-of-completion
method of accounting (the AICPAs Statement of Position 81-1 (SOP 81-1), Accounting for
Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts / ASC 605-35). Sales and
earnings under these contracts are recorded either based on the ratio of actual costs incurred to
date to total estimated costs expected to be incurred related to the contract or as products are
shipped under the units-of-delivery method. Anticipated losses on contracts are recognized in full
in the period in which losses become probable and estimable. Changes in estimates of profit or loss
on contracts are included in earnings on a cumulative basis in the period the estimate is changed.
During the three months ended January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, the Company recorded losses of
approximately $0.6 million and $0.2 million, respectively, related to loss contracts. During the
nine months ended January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, the Company recorded losses of approximately
$5.7 million and $1.6 million, respectively, related to loss contracts.
The Company also has contracts and purchase orders where revenue is recorded on delivery of
products or performance of services in accordance with authoritative guidance for revenue
recognition (Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (SAB 104), Revenue Recognition / ASC 605). Under
this standard, the Company recognizes revenue when an arrangement exists, prices are determinable,
collectability is reasonably assured and the goods or services have been delivered.
The Company also enters into certain leasing arrangements with customers and evaluates the
contracts in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 840 Leases. The Companys accounting for equipment
leases involves specific determinations under FAS 13, which often involve complex provisions and
significant judgments. In accordance with FAS 13, the Company classifies the transactions as
12
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
sales type or operating leases based on (1) review for transfers of ownership of the property
to the lessee by the end of the lease term, (2) review of the lease terms to determine if it
contains an option to purchase the leased property for a price which is sufficiently lower than the
expected fair value of the property at the date the option, (3) review of the lease term to
determine if it is equal to or greater than 75% of the economic life of the equipment and (4)
review of the present value of the minimum lease payments to determine if they are equal to or
greater than 90% of the fair market value of the equipment at the inception of the lease.
Additionally the Company considers the cancelability of the contract and any related uncertainty of
collections or risk in recoverability of the lease investment at lease inception. Revenue from
sales type leases is recognized at the inception of the lease or when the equipment has been
delivered and installed at the customer site, if installation is required. Revenues from equipment
rentals under operating leases are recognized as earned over the lease term, which is generally on
a straight-line basis.
When a sale involves multiple elements, such as sales of products that include services, the
entire fee from the arrangement is allocated to each respective element based on its relative fair
value in accordance with authoritative guidance for accounting for multiple element revenue
arrangements, (EITF 00-21, Accounting for Multiple Element Revenue Arrangements / ASC 605-25),
and recognized when the applicable revenue recognition criteria for each element have been met. The
amount of product and service revenue recognized is impacted by the Companys judgments as to
whether an arrangement includes multiple elements and, if so, whether sufficient objective and
reliable evidence of fair value exists for those elements. Changes to the elements in an
arrangement and the Companys ability to establish evidence for those elements could affect the
timing of the revenue recognition.
In accordance with authoritative guidance for shipping and handling fees and costs (EITF
00-10, Accounting for Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs / ASC 605-45), the Company records
shipping and handling costs billed to customers as a component of revenues, and shipping and
handling costs incurred by the Company for inbound and outbound freight are recorded as a component
of cost of revenues.
Collections in excess of revenues and deferred revenues represent cash collected from
customers in advance of revenue recognition and are recorded in accrued liabilities for obligations
within the next twelve months. Amounts for obligations extending beyond the twelve months are
recorded within other liabilities in the consolidated financial statements.
Contract costs on United States government contracts, including indirect costs, are subject to
audit and negotiations with United States government representatives. These audits have been
completed and agreed upon through fiscal year 2002. Contract revenues and accounts receivable are
stated at amounts which are expected to be realized upon final settlement.
Note 3 Fair Value Measurement
Effective March 29, 2008, the Company adopted the authoritative guidance for financial assets
and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The guidance does not require any new
fair value measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in prior authoritative guidance. The
guidance defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and establishes a
hierarchy that categorizes and prioritizes the sources to be used to estimate fair value. As a
basis for categorizing inputs, the guidance, establishes the following hierarchy which prioritizes
the inputs used to measure fair value from market based assumptions to entity specific assumptions:
|
|
Level 1 Inputs based on quoted market prices for identical assets or liabilities in active
markets at the measurement date. |
|
|
Level 2 Observable inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1, such as quoted
prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or
similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are
observable or can be corroborated by observable market data. |
|
|
Level 3 Inputs which reflect managements best estimate of what market participants would
use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The inputs are unobservable in
the market and significant to the instruments valuation. |
Effective April 4, 2009, the Company adopted the authoritative guidance for non-financial
assets and liabilities that are remeasured at fair value on a non-recurring basis without material
impact on its consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
The following tables present the Companys hierarchy for its assets and liabilities measured
at fair value on a recurring basis as of January 1, 2010 and April 3, 2009:
13
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
19,247 |
|
|
$ |
19,247 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
$ |
19,247 |
|
|
$ |
19,247 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair value at |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 3 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents |
|
$ |
2,029 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
2,023 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis |
|
$ |
2,029 |
|
|
$ |
6 |
|
|
$ |
2,023 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following section describes the valuation methodologies the Company uses to measure
financial instruments at fair value:
Cash equivalents The Companys cash equivalents consist of money market funds. Certain
money market funds are valued using quoted prices for identical assets in an active market with
sufficient volume and frequency of transactions (Level 1). The remaining portion of money market
funds are valued based on quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets
with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets), or brokers model driven
valuations in which all significant inputs are observable or can be obtained from or corroborated
by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets (Level 2).
Long-term debt As of January 1, 2010, the Companys long-term debt consisted of borrowings
under the Credit Facility, reported at the borrowed outstanding amount with current accrued
interest and the Notes reported at amortized cost. However, for disclosure purposes, the Company
is required to measure the fair value of outstanding debt on recurring basis. The fair value of
the Companys long-term debt approximates its carrying amount due to its variable interest rate on
revolving line of credit and the proximity of the date of issuance of the Notes compared to the reporting date.
The Company had no long-term debt as of April 3, 2009.
Foreign currency forward exchange contracts The Company had no foreign currency forward
exchange contracts outstanding at January 1, 2010 and April 3, 2009.
Note 4 Earnings Per Share Attributable to ViaSat, Inc. Common Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2009 |
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding used
in calculating basic net income per share |
|
|
32,777 |
|
|
|
30,836 |
|
|
|
31,863 |
|
|
|
30,699 |
|
Weighted average options to purchase common stock as
determined by application of the treasury stock
method |
|
|
1,603 |
|
|
|
736 |
|
|
|
1,335 |
|
|
|
984 |
|
Weighted average restricted stock units to acquire
common stock as determined by application of the
treasury stock method |
|
|
217 |
|
|
|
120 |
|
|
|
253 |
|
|
|
109 |
|
Weighted average contingently issuable shares in
connection with certain terms of the JAST
acquisition agreement |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
|
Weighted average potentially issuable shares in
connection with certain terms of the amended ViaSat
401(k) Profit Sharing Plan |
|
|
113 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
119 |
|
|
|
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan equivalents |
|
|
15 |
|
|
|
7 |
|
|
|
21 |
|
|
|
28 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares used in computing diluted net income per share |
|
|
34,725 |
|
|
|
31,699 |
|
|
|
33,591 |
|
|
|
31,826 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Antidilutive shares excluded from the calculation were 523,659 and 3,250,335 shares for the
three months ended January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, respectively, and 604,857 and 2,738,113
shares for the nine months ended January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, respectively.
14
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 5 Composition of Certain Balance Sheet Captions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Accounts receivable, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Billed |
|
$ |
93,204 |
|
|
$ |
76,999 |
|
Unbilled |
|
|
92,526 |
|
|
|
87,469 |
|
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
|
|
(129 |
) |
|
|
(362 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
185,601 |
|
|
$ |
164,106 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inventories: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raw materials |
|
$ |
38,480 |
|
|
$ |
33,607 |
|
Work in process |
|
|
17,557 |
|
|
|
14,876 |
|
Finished goods |
|
|
24,136 |
|
|
|
17,079 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
80,173 |
|
|
$ |
65,562 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses |
|
$ |
14,635 |
|
|
$ |
13,521 |
|
Income tax receivable |
|
|
5,060 |
|
|
|
2,460 |
|
Other |
|
|
1,837 |
|
|
|
2,960 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
21,532 |
|
|
$ |
18,941 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Property, equipment and satellites, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satellite WildBlue-1 (estimated useful life of 10 years) |
|
$ |
195,890 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
Capital lease of satellite capacity Anik F2 (estimated useful
life of 10 years) |
|
|
99,090 |
|
|
|
|
|
Machinery and equipment (estimated useful life 2-5 years) |
|
|
85,568 |
|
|
|
56,053 |
|
Computer equipment and software (estimated useful life 3 years) |
|
|
57,626 |
|
|
|
43,591 |
|
CPE leased equipment (estimated useful life of 3 years) |
|
|
35,033 |
|
|
|
|
|
Furniture and fixtures (estimated useful life 7 years) |
|
|
10,089 |
|
|
|
9,918 |
|
Leasehold improvements (estimated useful life 2-11 years) |
|
|
19,152 |
|
|
|
17,573 |
|
Building (estimated useful life of 24 years) |
|
|
9,994 |
|
|
|
|
|
Land |
|
|
4,384 |
|
|
|
3,124 |
|
Satellite under construction |
|
|
171,471 |
|
|
|
110,588 |
|
Construction in progress |
|
|
14,810 |
|
|
|
5,272 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
703,107 |
|
|
|
246,119 |
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization |
|
|
(90,776 |
) |
|
|
(75,894 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
612,331 |
|
|
$ |
170,225 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other acquired intangible assets, net: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Technology (estimated useful life of 3-9 years) |
|
$ |
44,392 |
|
|
$ |
44,392 |
|
Contracts and customer relationships (estimated useful life of
3-10 years) |
|
|
86,688 |
|
|
|
18,898 |
|
Non-compete agreement (estimated useful life of 3-5 years) |
|
|
9,076 |
|
|
|
9,076 |
|
Satellite co-location rights (estimated useful life of 10 years) |
|
|
8,600 |
|
|
|
|
|
Trade name (estimated useful life of 3 years) |
|
|
5,680 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other intangibles (estimated useful life of 8 months to 10 years) |
|
|
9,323 |
|
|
|
9,323 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
163,759 |
|
|
|
81,689 |
|
Less accumulated amortization |
|
|
(69,802 |
) |
|
|
(65,034 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,957 |
|
|
$ |
16,655 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other assets: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capitalized software costs, net |
|
$ |
5,923 |
|
|
$ |
672 |
|
Patents, orbital slots and other licenses, net |
|
|
7,072 |
|
|
|
4,144 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
43,686 |
|
|
|
13,771 |
|
Other |
|
|
22,212 |
|
|
|
13,222 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
78,893 |
|
|
$ |
31,809 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of warranty reserve |
|
$ |
6,726 |
|
|
$ |
6,853 |
|
Accrued vacation |
|
|
11,997 |
|
|
|
10,935 |
|
Accrued employee compensation |
|
|
10,226 |
|
|
|
16,768 |
|
Collections in excess of revenues and deferred revenues |
|
|
48,957 |
|
|
|
26,811 |
|
Other |
|
|
22,315 |
|
|
|
10,670 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
100,221 |
|
|
$ |
72,037 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Other liabilities: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued warranty |
|
$ |
4,141 |
|
|
$ |
4,341 |
|
Unrecognized tax position liabilities |
|
|
10,773 |
|
|
|
10,773 |
|
Deferred rent, long-term portion |
|
|
6,170 |
|
|
|
6,191 |
|
Deferred revenue, long-term portion |
|
|
3,332 |
|
|
|
|
|
Other |
|
|
6,835 |
|
|
|
3,413 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
31,251 |
|
|
$ |
24,718 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 6 Accounting for Goodwill and Intangible Assets
The Company accounts for its goodwill under the authoritative guidance for goodwill and other
intangible assets (SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets / ASC 350). The guidance for
the goodwill impairment model is a two-step process. First, it requires a comparison of the book
value of net assets to the fair value of the reporting units that have goodwill assigned to them.
Reporting units within the Companys government systems, commercial networks and satellite services
segments have goodwill assigned to them. The Company estimates the fair values of the reporting
units using discounted cash flows. The cash flow forecasts are adjusted by an appropriate discount
rate in order to determine the present value of the cash flows. If the fair value is determined to
be less than book value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment. In
this process, a fair value for goodwill is estimated, based in part on the fair value of the
reporting unit used in the first step, and is compared to its carrying value. The shortfall of the
fair value below carrying value, if any, represents the amount of goodwill impairment.
The Company will continue to make assessments of impairment on an annual basis in the fourth
quarter of its fiscal year or more frequently if specific triggering events occur. In assessing the
value of goodwill, the Company must make assumptions regarding estimated future cash flows and
other factors to determine the fair value of the reporting units. If these estimates or their
related assumptions change in the future, the Company may be required to record impairment charges
that would negatively impact operating results.
The acquisition of WildBlue during the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 resulted in an
increase of the Companys goodwill of approximately $8.6 million, which was recorded within the
Companys satellite services segment.
The other acquired intangible assets are amortized using the straight-line method over their
estimated useful lives of eight months to ten years. Amortization expense was $1.9 million and
$2.3 million for the three months ended January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, respectively, and $4.8
million and $7.0 million for the nine months ended January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009,
respectively.
Current and expected amortization expense for acquired intangibles for each of the following
periods is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
For the nine months ended January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
4,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected for the remainder of fiscal year 2010 |
|
$ |
4,598 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2011 |
|
|
17,777 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2012 |
|
|
16,551 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2013 |
|
|
13,446 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2014 |
|
|
11,705 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
29,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
16
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 7 Long-Term Debt and Line of Credit
Long-term debt consisted of the following as of January 1, 2010 and April 3, 2009:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Line of credit |
|
$ |
140,000 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes due 2016 (the Notes) |
|
|
275,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Unamortized discount on the Notes |
|
|
(3,323 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Notes |
|
|
271,677 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: current portion of long-term debt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
411,677 |
|
|
$ |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior notes due 2016
On October 22, 2009, the Company issued $275.0 million in principal amount of senior notes all of which is due
2016 (the Notes) in a private placement to institutional buyers. The Notes bear interest at the
rate of 8.875% per year, payable semi-annually in cash in arrears commencing in March 2010 and were
issued with an original issue discount of 1.24% or, $3.4 million. The Notes are recorded as
long-term debt, net of original issue discount, in the Companys consolidated financial statements.
The original issue discount and deferred financing cost associated with the issuance of the Notes
is amortized to interest expense over the term of the Notes.
The Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by each of the Companys existing and
future subsidiaries that guarantees the Credit Facility. The Notes and the guarantees are the
Companys and the guarantors general senior unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of
payment with all of the Companys existing and future unsecured unsubordinated debt. The Notes and
the guarantees are effectively junior in right of payment to their existing and future secured
debt, including under the Credit Facility (to the extent of the value of the assets securing such
debt), are structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities (including trade
payables) of the Companys subsidiaries that are not guarantors of the Notes, and are senior in
right of payment to all of their existing and future subordinated indebtedness.
The indenture agreement governing the Notes limits, among other things, the Companys and its
restricted subsidiaries ability to: incur, assume or guarantee additional debt; issue redeemable
stock and preferred stock; pay dividends, make distributions or redeem or repurchase capital stock;
prepay, redeem or repurchase subordinated debt; make loans and investments; grant or incur liens;
restrict dividends, loans or asset transfers from restricted subsidiaries; sell or otherwise
dispose of assets; enter into transactions with affiliates; reduce the Companys satellite
insurance; and consolidate or merge with, or sell substantially all of their assets to, another
person.
Prior to September 15, 2012, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the Notes at a redemption
price of 108.875% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any,
thereon to the redemption date, from the net cash proceeds of specified equity offerings. Prior to
September 15, 2012, the Company may also redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, at a redemption
price equal to 100% of the principal amount thereof plus the applicable premium and any accrued and
unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the redemption date. The applicable premium is calculated as
the greater of: (i) 1.0% of the principal amount of such Notes and (ii) the excess, if any, of (a)
the present value at such date of redemption of (1) the redemption price of such Notes on September
15, 2012 plus (2) all required interest payments due on such Notes through September 15, 2012
(excluding accrued but unpaid interest to the date of redemption), computed using a discount rate
equal to the Treasury Rate plus 50 basis points, over (b) the then-outstanding principal amount of
such Notes. The Notes may be redeemed, in whole or in part, at any time during the twelve months
beginning on September 15, 2012 at a redemption price of 106.656%, during the twelve months
beginning on September 15, 2013 at a redemption price of 104.438%, during the twelve months
beginning on September 15, 2014 at a redemption price of 102.219%, and at any time on or after
September 12, 2015 at a redemption price of 100%, in each case plus accrued and unpaid interest, if
any, thereon to the redemption date.
In the event a change of control occurs (as defined under the indenture), each holder will
have the right to require the Company to repurchase all or any part (equal to $2,000 or larger
integral multiples of $1,000) of such holders Notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of
the aggregate principal amount of the Notes repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any,
to the date of purchase (subject to the right of holders of record on the relevant record date to
receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date).
In connection with the private placement of the Notes, the Company and the guarantors entered
into a registration rights agreement with the initial purchasers in which the Company agreed to
file a registration statement with the SEC to permit the holders to exchange or resell the Notes.
The Company must use commercially reasonable efforts to consummate an exchange offer within 365
days after
17
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
the issuance of the Notes or, under certain circumstances, to prepare and file a shelf
registration statement to cover the resale of the Notes. If the Company and the guarantors do not
comply with certain of their obligations under the registration rights agreement, the registration
rights agreement provides that additional interest will accrue on the principal amount of the Notes
at a rate of 0.25% per annum during the 90-day period immediately following such default and will
increase by 0.25% per annum at the end of each subsequent 90-day period, but in no event will the
penalty rate exceed 1.00% per annum.
Credit Facility
The Credit Facility, as amended, provides a revolving line of credit of $210.0 million
(including up to $25.0 million of letters of credit), which facility matures on July 1, 2012.
Borrowings under the Credit Facility bear interest, at the Companys option, at either (a) the
highest of the Federal Funds rate plus 0.50%, the Eurodollar rate plus 1.00% or the administrative
agents prime rate as announced from time to time, or (b) at the Eurodollar rate plus, in the case
of each of (a) and (b), an applicable margin that is based on the ratio of the Companys debt to
earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). At January 1, 2010, the
effective interest rate on the Companys outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was
4.25%. The Credit Facility is guaranteed by certain of the Companys domestic subsidiaries and
collateralized by substantially all of the Companys and the guarantors assets.
The Credit Facility contains financial covenants regarding a maximum leverage ratio, a maximum
senior secured leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio. In addition, the Credit
Facility contains covenants that restrict, among other things, the Companys ability to sell
assets, make investments and acquisitions, make capital expenditures, grant liens, pay dividends
and make certain other restricted payments. On December 14, 2009, the Company amended the Credit Facility to clarify the calculation of EBITDA following the completion of
the WildBlue acquisition.
The Company was in compliance with its financial covenants under the Credit Facility as of
January 1, 2010. At January 1, 2010, the Company had $140.0 million in principal amount of
outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility and $12.2 million outstanding under standby
letters of credit, leaving borrowing availability under the Credit Facility of $57.8 million.
Note 8 Product Warranty
The Company provides limited warranties on its products for periods of up to five years. The
Company records a liability for its warranty obligations when products are shipped or they are
included in long-term construction contracts based upon an estimate of expected warranty costs.
Amounts expected to be incurred within twelve months are classified as a current liability. For
mature products, the warranty cost estimates are based on historical experience with the particular
product. For newer products that do not have a history of warranty costs, the Company bases its
estimates on its experience with the technology involved and the type of failures that may occur.
It is possible that the Companys underlying assumptions will not reflect the actual experience and
in that case, future adjustments will be made to the recorded warranty obligation. The following
table reflects the change in the Companys warranty accrual during the nine months ended January 1,
2010 and January 2, 2009.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the nine months ended |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
$ |
11,194 |
|
|
$ |
11,679 |
|
Change in liability for warranties issued in period |
|
|
4,602 |
|
|
|
6,532 |
|
Settlements made (in cash or in kind) during the period |
|
|
(4,929 |
) |
|
|
(6,143 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, end of period |
|
$ |
10,867 |
|
|
$ |
12,068 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 9 Commitments and Contingencies
The Company is involved in a variety of claims, suits, investigations and proceedings arising
in the ordinary course of business, including actions with respect to intellectual property claims,
breach of contract claims, labor and employment claims, tax and other matters. Although claims,
suits, investigations and proceedings are inherently uncertain and their results cannot be
predicted with certainty, the Company believes that the resolution of its current pending matters
will not have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations
or liquidity.
18
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 10 Income Taxes
The Company currently estimates its annual effective income tax rate to be approximately 17.4%
for the fiscal year ending April 2, 2010, as compared to the actual 15.0% effective tax rate for
the fiscal year ended April 3, 2009. The estimated effective tax rate for fiscal 2010 is different
from the expected statutory rate due primarily to the research and development tax credits,
partially offset by non-deductible costs associated with the WildBlue acquisition. In addition,
the fiscal year 2010 annual effective tax rate includes the recognition of approximately $2.6
million of previously unrecognized tax benefits due to the expiration of the statute of limitations
for certain previously filed tax returns. The Companys estimated annual effective tax rate of
approximately 17.4% for fiscal year 2010 reflects the expiration of the federal research and
development tax credit on December 31, 2009. If the federal research and development tax credit is
reinstated, the Company may have a lower annual effective tax rate and the amount of the tax rate
reduction will depend on the effective date of any such reinstatement, the terms of the
reinstatement as well as the amount of eligible research and development expenses in the reinstated
period.
The income tax benefit of $2.9 million for the third quarter of fiscal 2010 is lower than the
expected tax expense based on the estimated annual effective tax rate primarily due to the
recognition of approximately $2.6 million of previously unrecognized tax benefits due to the
expiration of the statute of limitations for certain previously filed tax returns, partially offset
by the non-deductible costs associated with the WildBlue acquisition.
The Companys valuation allowance against deferred tax assets increased from $2.1 million at
April 3, 2009 to $10.9 million at January 1, 2010. The increase in the valuation allowance was
due to the acquisition of certain deferred tax assets of WildBlue. The acquired deferred tax assets
from WildBlue were recorded net of the valuation allowance. The valuation allowance relates to
state net operating loss carryforwards and research credit carryforwards available to reduce state
income taxes.
For the three and nine months ended January 1, 2010, the Companys gross unrecognized tax
benefits decreased by $1.9 million and $0.6 million, respectively. In the next twelve months it is
reasonably possible that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will decrease by $2.9 million as a
result of the expiration of the statute of limitations for previously filed tax returns.
Note 11 Acquisition
On December 15, 2009, the Company completed the acquisition of all outstanding shares of
WildBlue, a privately held provider of broadband internet service, delivering two-way broadband
internet access via satellite in the contiguous United States. The purchase price of approximately
$574.6 million was comprised primarily of $131.9 million related to the fair value of 4,286,450
shares of the Companys common stock issued at the closing date and $442.7 million in cash
consideration. The $442.7 million in cash consideration
paid to the former WildBlue stockholders less cash acquired of $64.7 million resulted in a net cash
outlay of approximately $378.0 million.
The Company accounts for business combinations pursuant to the authoritative guidance for
business combinations (Statement of Financial Accounting Standard (SFAS) No. 141R (SFAS 141R),
Business Combinations, / ASC 805). Accordingly, the Company allocated the purchase price of the
acquired company to the net tangible assets and intangible assets acquired based upon their
estimated fair values. Under the authoritative guidance for business combinations,
acquisition-related transaction costs and acquisition-related restructuring charges are not
included as components of consideration transferred but are accounted for as expenses in the period
in which the costs are incurred. Total merger-related transaction costs incurred by the Company
were approximately $7.1 million, of which $4.6 million and $7.1 million were incurred and recorded
in selling, general and administrative expenses in the three and nine months ending January 1,
2010, respectively.
The preliminary purchase price allocation of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities based
on the estimated fair values as of December 15, 2009 is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Current assets |
|
$ |
106,672 |
|
Property, equipment and satellites |
|
|
378,378 |
|
Identifiable intangible assets |
|
|
82,070 |
|
Goodwill |
|
|
8,633 |
|
Deferred income taxes |
|
|
23,609 |
|
Other assets |
|
|
1,969 |
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets acquired |
|
|
601,331 |
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
(19,544 |
) |
Other long term liabilities |
|
|
(7,168 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities assumed |
|
|
(26,712 |
) |
|
|
|
|
Total purchase price |
|
$ |
574,619 |
|
|
|
|
|
19
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Amounts assigned to identifiable intangible assets are being amortized on a straight-line
basis over their estimated useful lives and are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Preliminary |
|
|
Estimated |
|
|
|
fair value |
|
|
remaining |
|
|
|
(in thousands) |
|
|
life |
|
Trade name |
|
$ |
5,680 |
|
|
|
3 |
|
Customer relationshipsretail |
|
|
39,840 |
|
|
|
6 |
|
Customer relationshipswholesale |
|
|
27,950 |
|
|
|
8 |
|
Satellite co-location rights |
|
|
8,600 |
|
|
|
10 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total identifiable intangible assets |
|
$ |
82,070 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The intangible assets acquired in the WildBlue business combination were determined, in
accordance with the authoritative guidance for business combinations, based on the estimated fair
values using valuation techniques consistent with the market approach, income approach and/or cost
approach to measure fair value. The remaining useful lives were estimated based on the underlying
agreements and/or the future economic benefit expected to be received from the assets. Under the terms of the co-location right agreement, the Company has certain option periods that begin in approximately 10 years
based upon the life of
Anik F2 Ka-Band Payload.
The acquisition of WildBlue is beneficial to the Company as it enables the Company to
integrate the extensive bandwidth capacity of its ViaSat-1 satellite into WildBlues existing
distribution and fulfillment resources, which are expected to reduce initial service costs and
improve subscriber growth. These benefits and additional opportunities were among the factors that
contributed to a purchase price resulting in the recognition of preliminary estimated goodwill,
which was recorded within the Companys satellite services segment. The intangible assets and
goodwill recognized are not deductible for federal income tax purposes. The purchase price
allocation is preliminary due to pending resolution of certain WildBlue tax attributes.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the operating results of WildBlue from
the date of acquisition. Since the acquisition date, the Company recorded approximately $9.0
million in revenue and $1.7 million of operating losses with respect to the WildBlue business in the condensed consolidated statements of
operations.
Unaudited Pro Forma Financial Information
The unaudited financial information in the table below summarizes the combined results of
operations for the Company and WildBlue on a pro forma basis, as though the companies had been
combined as of the beginning of fiscal year 2009. The pro forma financial information is presented
for informational purposes only and may not be indicative of the results of operations that would
have been achieved if the acquisition had taken place at the beginning of fiscal year 2009. The pro
forma financial information for the three and nine month periods ended January 1, 2010 and January
2, 2009 include the business combination accounting effect on historical WildBlue revenue,
elimination of the historical ViaSat revenues and related costs of revenues derived from sales of
CPE to WildBlue, amortization and depreciation charges from acquired intangible and tangible assets,
difference between WildBlues and ViaSats historical interest expense/interest income due to
ViaSats new capitalization structure as a result of the acquisition, related tax effects and
adjustment to shares outstanding for shares issued for the acquisition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended |
|
|
Nine Months Ended |
|
|
|
(in thousands, except per share data) |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2009 |
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2009 |
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
196,779 |
|
|
$ |
192,497 |
|
|
$ |
605,310 |
|
|
$ |
583,712 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income attributable to ViaSat, Inc. |
|
$ |
4,114 |
|
|
$ |
2,177 |
|
|
$ |
20,014 |
|
|
$ |
1,573 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net income per share
attributable to ViaSat, Inc. common
stockholders |
|
$ |
.11 |
|
|
$ |
.06 |
|
|
$ |
.55 |
|
|
$ |
.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net income per share
attributable to ViaSat, Inc. common
stockholders |
|
$ |
.11 |
|
|
$ |
.06 |
|
|
$ |
.53 |
|
|
$ |
.04 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
20
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Note 12 Restructuring
In the third quarter of fiscal year 2010, the Company initiated a post-acquisition restructuring
plan related to the termination of certain duplicative employee positions upon the acquisition of
WildBlue. Under the terms of the plan, the Company recorded restructuring charges of approximately
$2.7 million as part of selling, general and administrative expenses within the satellite services
segment, all of which remained unpaid and were recorded in accrued liabilities as of January 1,
2010. In late January 2010, the Company paid approximately $2.4 million of the outstanding
restructuring liabilities.
Note 13 Segment Information
The Companys reporting segments, comprised of the government systems, commercial networks and
satellite services segments, are primarily distinguished by the type of customer and the related
contractual requirements. The Companys government systems segment develops and produces network
centric, IP-based secure government communications systems, products and solutions. The more
regulated government environment is subject to unique contractual requirements and possesses
economic characteristics which differ from the commercial networks and satellite services segments.
The Companys commercial networks segment develops and produces a variety of advanced end-to-end
satellite communication systems and ground networking equipment and products, and comprises the
Companys former satellite networks and antenna systems segments, except for the satellite services
segment. The Companys satellite services segment includes both the Companys recently acquired
WildBlue business (which provides wholesale and retail satellite-based broadband internet services
in the United States) and the Companys managed network services which complement the commercial
networks segment by supporting the satellite communication systems of the Companys enterprise and
mobile broadband customers. The Companys satellite services segment also includes the Companys
ViaSat-1 satellite-related activities. The Companys segments are determined consistent with the
way management currently organizes and evaluates financial information internally for making
operating decisions and assessing performance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2009 |
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Systems |
|
$ |
89,078 |
|
|
$ |
93,757 |
|
|
$ |
284,453 |
|
|
$ |
279,704 |
|
Commercial Networks |
|
|
55,009 |
|
|
|
54,208 |
|
|
|
172,709 |
|
|
|
176,364 |
|
Satellite Services |
|
|
12,277 |
|
|
|
2,397 |
|
|
|
18,276 |
|
|
|
6,535 |
|
Elimination of intersegment revenues |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total revenues |
|
$ |
156,364 |
|
|
$ |
150,362 |
|
|
$ |
475,438 |
|
|
$ |
462,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating profits (losses) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Systems |
|
|
10,780 |
|
|
|
14,255 |
|
|
|
37,182 |
|
|
|
39,638 |
|
Commercial Networks |
|
|
(835 |
) |
|
|
72 |
|
|
|
2,950 |
|
|
|
629 |
|
Satellite Services |
|
|
(6,177 |
) |
|
|
(431 |
) |
|
|
(10,219 |
) |
|
|
(3,256 |
) |
Elimination of intersegment operating profits |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(60 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Segment operating profit before corporate and amortization |
|
|
3,768 |
|
|
|
13,849 |
|
|
|
29,913 |
|
|
|
36,951 |
|
Corporate |
|
|
(5 |
) |
|
|
47 |
|
|
|
17 |
|
|
|
85 |
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles |
|
|
(1,901 |
) |
|
|
(2,337 |
) |
|
|
(4,768 |
) |
|
|
(7,017 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
$ |
1,862 |
|
|
$ |
11,559 |
|
|
$ |
25,162 |
|
|
$ |
30,019 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
21
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
Amortization of acquired intangibles by segment for the three and nine months ended January 1,
2010 and January 2, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2009 |
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Government Systems |
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
272 |
|
|
$ |
816 |
|
|
$ |
816 |
|
Commercial Networks |
|
|
1,089 |
|
|
|
2,065 |
|
|
|
3,412 |
|
|
|
6,201 |
|
Satellite Services |
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total amortization of intangibles |
|
$ |
1,901 |
|
|
$ |
2,337 |
|
|
$ |
4,768 |
|
|
$ |
7,017 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets identifiable to segments include: accounts receivable, unbilled accounts receivable,
inventory, acquired intangible assets and goodwill. Segment assets as of January 1, 2010 and April
3, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Segment assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Systems |
|
$ |
161,732 |
|
|
$ |
145,568 |
|
Commercial Networks |
|
|
162,209 |
|
|
|
164,844 |
|
Satellite Services |
|
|
109,598 |
|
|
|
1,278 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total segment assets |
|
|
433,539 |
|
|
|
311,690 |
|
Corporate assets |
|
|
820,492 |
|
|
|
311,252 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
|
$ |
1,254,031 |
|
|
$ |
622,942 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net acquired intangible assets and goodwill included in segment assets as of January 1, 2010
and April 3, 2009 were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net acquired intangible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
assets |
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
Government Systems |
|
$ |
1,976 |
|
|
$ |
2,792 |
|
|
$ |
22,161 |
|
|
$ |
22,161 |
|
Commercial Networks |
|
|
10,451 |
|
|
|
13,863 |
|
|
|
43,268 |
|
|
|
43,268 |
|
Satellite Services |
|
|
81,530 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
8,633 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
93,957 |
|
|
$ |
16,655 |
|
|
$ |
74,062 |
|
|
$ |
65,429 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue information by geographic area for the three and nine months ended January 1, 2010 and
January 2, 2009 was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2009 |
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
January 2, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
United States |
|
$ |
120,321 |
|
|
$ |
128,662 |
|
|
$ |
380,723 |
|
|
$ |
391,156 |
|
Europe, Middle East and Africa |
|
|
24,662 |
|
|
|
12,223 |
|
|
|
64,261 |
|
|
|
34,220 |
|
Asia, Pacific |
|
|
5,944 |
|
|
|
5,489 |
|
|
|
18,380 |
|
|
|
20,991 |
|
North America other than United States |
|
|
2,782 |
|
|
|
3,151 |
|
|
|
5,650 |
|
|
|
12,822 |
|
Latin America |
|
|
2,655 |
|
|
|
837 |
|
|
|
6,424 |
|
|
|
3,414 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
156,364 |
|
|
$ |
150,362 |
|
|
$ |
475,438 |
|
|
$ |
462,603 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company distinguishes revenues from external customers by geographic areas based on
customer location.
The net book value of long-lived assets located outside the United States was $3.7 million and
$0.3 million at January 1, 2010 and April 3, 2009, respectively.
Note 14 Certain Relationships and Related-Party Transactions
Michael Targoff, a director of the Company since February 2003, currently serves as the Chief
Executive Officer and the Vice Chairman of the board of directors of Loral Space & Communications,
Inc. (Loral), the parent of Space Systems/Loral, Inc. (SS/L), and is also a director of Telesat
Holdings Inc., a joint venture company formed by Loral and the Public Sector Pension Investment
Board to acquire Telesat Canada in October 2007. John Stenbit, a director of the Company since
August 2004, also currently serves on the board of directors of Loral.
Under the satellite construction contract with SS/L, the Company purchased a new high-capacity
Ka-band spot-beam satellite (ViaSat-1) designed by the Company and currently under construction by
SS/L for approximately $209.1 million, subject to purchase
22
VIASAT, INC.
NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(UNAUDITED)
price adjustments based on satellite performance. In addition, the Company entered into a beam
sharing agreement with Loral, whereby Loral is responsible for contributing 15% of the total costs
(estimated at approximately $57.6 million) associated with the ViaSat-1 satellite project. The
Companys purchase of the ViaSat-1 satellite from SS/L was approved by the disinterested members of
the Companys Board of Directors, after a determination by the disinterested members of the
Companys Board that the terms and conditions of the purchase were fair to the Company and in the
best interests of the Company and its stockholders.
During the nine months ended January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, under the satellite
construction contract, the Company paid $51.3 million and $65.3 million, respectively, to SS/L and
had $3.8 million and a $9.7 million payable related to SS/L as of January 1, 2010 and April 3,
2009, respectively. During the nine months ending January 1, 2010, the Company also received $2.4
million from SS/L under the beam sharing agreement with Loral. There was no cash received from
SS/L for the nine months ending January 2, 2009. Accounts receivable due from SS/L under the beam
sharing agreement with Loral were $0.2 million and $0.3 million as of January 1, 2010 and April 3,
2009, respectively. From time to time the Company enters into various contracts in the ordinary course of
business with Telesat Canada. All amounts for the respective periods were not material.
Note 15 Subsequent Events
On January 4, 2010, the Company repurchased 251,731 shares of ViaSat common stock from
Intelsat USA Sales Corp (Intelsat) for $8.0 million in cash.
23
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statements
This Quarterly Report, including Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements regarding future events and our
future results that are subject to the safe harbors created under the Securities Act of 1933 and
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. These statements are based on current expectations, estimates,
forecasts and projections about the industries in which we operate and the beliefs and assumptions
of our management. We use words such as anticipate, believe, continue, could, estimate,
expect, goal, intend, may, plan, project, seek, should, target, will, would,
variations of such words and similar expressions to identify forward-looking statements. In
addition, statements that refer to projections of earnings, revenue, costs or other financial
items; anticipated growth and trends in our business or key markets; future growth and revenues
from our products; future economic conditions and performance; anticipated performance of products
or services; plans, objectives and strategies for future operations; and other characterizations of
future events or circumstances, are forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these
forward-looking statements are only predictions and are subject to risks, uncertainties and
assumptions that are difficult to predict, including those identified under the heading Risk
Factors in Item 1A, elsewhere in this report and our other filings with the Securities and
Exchange Commission (SEC). Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those
expressed in any forward-looking statements. We undertake no obligation to revise or update any
forward-looking statements for any reason.
Company Overview
We are a leading provider of advanced satellite and wireless communications and secure
networking systems, products and services. We have leveraged our success developing complex
satellite communication systems and equipment for the U.S. government and select commercial
customers to develop end-to-end satellite network solutions for a wide array of applications and
customers. Our product and systems offerings are often linked through common underlying
technologies, customer applications and market relationships. We believe that our portfolio of
products, combined with our ability to effectively cross-deploy technologies between government and
commercial segments and across different geographic markets, provides us with a strong foundation
to sustain and enhance our leadership in advanced communications and networking technologies. Our
customers, including the U.S. government, leading aerospace and defense prime contractors, network
integrators and communications service providers, rely on our solutions to meet their complex
communications and networking requirements. In addition, following our recent acquisition of
WildBlue, we are a leading provider of satellite broadband internet services in the United States.
ViaSat was incorporated in California in 1986, and reincorporated as a Delaware corporation in
1996.
On
December 15, 2009, we completed our acquisition of WildBlue Holding, Inc. (WildBlue), a leading Ka-band satellite
broadband internet service provider. In connection with the acquisition, we paid approximately
$442.7 million in cash and issued approximately 4.29 million shares of ViaSat common stock to
WildBlue equity and debt holders. ViaSat retained approximately $64.7 million of WildBlues cash on
hand. To finance part of the cash payment made to WildBlue equity and debt holders, in October 2009
we issued $275.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.875% senior notes due 2016 (the Notes). To provide
additional liquidity and flexibility in connection with the WildBlue acquisition, in October 2009
we also increased the amount of our revolving line of credit to $210.0 million.
ViaSat operates in three segments: government systems, commercial networks and satellite
services.
Government Systems
Our government systems segment develops and produces network-centric internet protocol
(IP)-based secure government communications systems, products and solutions, which are designed to
enable the collection and dissemination of secure real-time digital information between command
centers, communications nodes and air defense systems. Customers of our government systems segment
include tactical armed forces, public safety first-responders and remote government employees.
24
The primary products and services of our government systems segment include:
|
|
Tactical data links, including Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS)
terminals for military fighter jets, and their successor, MIDS Joint Tactical Radio System
(MIDS JTRS) terminals (which we expect will be available in 2010), disposable
weapon data links, portable small tactical terminals and digital video data links for
intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance from Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs) and ground
systems, |
|
|
Information assurance products that enable military and government users to communicate
information securely over networks, and that secure data stored on computers and storage
devices, and |
|
|
Government satellite communication systems, including an array of portable and fixed
broadband modems, terminals, network access control systems and antenna systems using a range
of satellite frequency bands. |
Commercial Networks
Our commercial networks segment develops and produces a variety of advanced end-to-end
satellite communication systems and ground networking equipment and products that address five key
market segments: enterprise, consumer, in-flight, maritime and ground mobile applications. These
communication systems, networking equipment and products are generally developed through a
combination of customer and discretionary internal research and development funding.
Our satellite communication systems and ground networking equipment and products cater to a
wide range of domestic and international commercial customers and include:
|
|
Mobile broadband satellite communication systems, designed for use in aircraft, seagoing
vessels and high-speed trains, |
|
|
Consumer broadband, including next-generation satellite network infrastructure and ground
terminals to access high capacity satellites, |
|
|
Satellite networking systems design and technology development, including design and
technology services covering all aspects of satellite communication system architecture and
technology, |
|
|
Enterprise Very Small Aperture Terminal (VSAT) networks and products, designed to provide
enterprises with broadband access to the internet or private networks, and |
|
|
Antenna systems for terrestrial and satellite applications, specializing in small,
low-profile, multi-band antennas for mobile satellite communications. |
Satellite Services
Our satellite services segment complements our commercial networks segment by providing
wholesale and retail satellite-based broadband internet services in the United States via our
satellite and capacity agreements and managed network services for the satellite communication
systems of our enterprise and mobile broadband customers.
The primary services offered by our satellite services segment comprise:
|
|
Wholesale and retail broadband services, comprised of WildBlue® service, which provides
two-way satellite-based broadband internet access to consumers and small businesses in the
United States. As of January 1, 2010, we provided WildBlue service to approximately 423,000
subscribers. |
|
|
Mobile broadband services, comprised of network management services for customers who use
our ArcLight-based mobile satellite systems, and |
|
|
Managed broadband services, comprised of a full-service managed broadband service for
everyday enterprise networking or backup protection for primary networks. |
25
In addition, following the launch of ViaSat-1, we expect to provide wholesale broadband service
over ViaSat-1 in the United States at speeds and volumes that provide a broadband experience that
is comparable to or better than terrestrial broadband alternatives such as
cable modems and DSL connections. We expect this service to become available in 2011. We plan to
offer wholesale broadband services via ViaSat-1 to national and regional distribution partners,
including retail service providers and communications companies.
Sources of Revenues
To date, our ability to grow and maintain our revenues has depended on our ability to identify
and target markets where the customer places a high priority on the technology solution, and our
ability to obtain additional sizable contract awards. Due to the nature of this process, it is
difficult to predict the probability and timing of obtaining awards in these markets.
Our products are provided primarily through three types of contracts: fixed-price,
time-and-materials and cost-reimbursement contracts. Fixed-price contracts, which require us to
provide products and services under a contract at a specified price, comprised approximately 92%
and 87% of our revenues for the three months ended January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009,
respectively, and 90% and 86% of our revenues for the nine months ended January 1, 2010 and January
2, 2009, respectively. The remainder of our revenue for such periods was derived from
cost-reimbursement contracts (under which we are reimbursed for all actual costs incurred in
performing the contract to the extent such costs are within the contract ceiling and allowable
under the terms of the contract, plus a fee or profit) and from time-and-materials contracts (which
reimburse us for the number of labor hours expended at an established hourly rate negotiated in the
contract, plus the cost of materials utilized in providing such products or services).
Historically, a significant portion of our revenues has been derived from customer contracts
that include the research and development of products. The research and development efforts are
conducted in direct response to the customers specific requirements and, accordingly, expenditures
related to such efforts are included in cost of sales when incurred and the related funding (which
includes a profit component) is included in revenues. Revenues for our funded research and
development from our customer contracts were approximately $17.1 million or 11% and $28.9
million or 19% of our total revenues in the three months ended January 1, 2010 and
January 2, 2009, respectively. Revenues for our funded research and development from our customer
contracts were approximately $75.0 million or 16% and
$93.3 million or 20% of our total
revenues in the nine months ended January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, respectively.
We also incur independent research and development expenses, which are not directly funded by
a third party. Independent research and development expenses consist primarily of salaries and
other personnel-related expenses, supplies, prototype materials, testing and certification related
to research and development programs. Independent research and development expenses were
approximately 5% of revenues during the three months ended January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009, and
5% of revenues during the nine months ended January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009. As a government
contractor, we are able to recover a portion of our independent research and development expenses
pursuant to our government contracts.
Our satellite services segment revenues are primarily derived from our recently acquired
WildBlue business (which provides wholesale and retail satellite-based broadband internet services
in the United States) and our managed network services which complement the commercial networks
segment by supporting the satellite communication systems of the Companys enterprise and mobile
broadband customers.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
discusses our condensed consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (GAAP). The preparation of these
financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the
date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting period. We consider the policies discussed below to be critical to an understanding of
our financial statements because their application places the most significant demands on
managements judgment, with financial reporting results relying on estimation about the effect of
matters that are inherently uncertain. We describe the specific risks for these critical accounting
policies in the following paragraphs. For all of these policies, we caution that future events
rarely develop exactly as forecast, and even the best estimates routinely require adjustment.
26
Revenue recognition
A substantial portion of our revenues is derived from long-term contracts requiring
development and delivery of complex equipment built to customer specifications. Sales related to
these contracts are accounted for under authoritative guidance for the percentage-of-completion
method of accounting (the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) Statement of
Position 81-1 (SOP 81-1), Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain
Production-Type Contracts / ASC 605-35). Sales and earnings under these contracts are recorded
either based on the ratio of actual costs incurred to date to total estimated costs expected to be
incurred related to the contract or as products are shipped under the units-of-delivery method.
The percentage-of-completion method of accounting requires management to estimate the profit
margin for each individual contract and to apply that profit margin on a uniform basis as sales are
recorded under the contract. The estimation of profit margins requires management to make
projections of the total sales to be generated and the total costs that will be incurred under a
contract. These projections require management to make numerous assumptions and estimates relating
to items such as the complexity of design and related development costs, performance of
subcontractors, availability and cost of materials, labor productivity and cost, overhead and
capital costs and manufacturing efficiency. These contracts often include purchase options for
additional quantities and customer change orders for additional or revised product functionality.
Purchase options and change orders are accounted for either as an integral part of the original
contract or separately depending upon the nature and value of the item. For contract claims or
similar items, we apply judgment in estimating the amounts and assessing the potential for
realization. These amounts are only included in contract value when they can be reliably estimated
and realization is considered probable. Anticipated losses on contracts are recognized in full in
the period in which losses become probable and estimable. During the three months ended January 1,
2010 and January 2, 2009, we recorded losses of approximately $0.6 million and $0.2 million,
respectively, related to loss contracts. During the nine months ended January 1, 2010 and January
2, 2009, we recorded losses of approximately $5.7 million and $1.6 million, respectively, related
to loss contracts.
Assuming the initial estimates of sales and costs under a contract are accurate, the
percentage-of-completion method results in the profit margin being recorded evenly as revenue is
recognized under the contract. Changes in these underlying estimates due to revisions in sales and
future cost estimates or the exercise of contract options may result in profit margins being
recognized unevenly over a contract as such changes are accounted for on a cumulative basis in the
period estimates are revised.
We believe we have established appropriate systems and processes to enable us to reasonably
estimate future cost on our programs through regular quarterly evaluations of contract costs,
scheduling and technical matters by business unit personnel and management. Historically, in the
aggregate, we have not experienced significant deviations in actual costs from estimated program
costs, and when deviations that result in significant adjustments arise, we would disclose the
related impact in Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations. However, these estimates require significant management judgment and a significant
change in future cost estimates on one or more programs could have a material effect on our results
of operations. A one percent variance in our future cost estimates on open fixed-price contracts as
of January 1, 2010 would change our income before income taxes by approximately $0.4 million.
We also have contracts and purchase orders where revenue is recorded on delivery of products
or performance of services in accordance with the authoritative guidance for revenue recognition
(Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (SAB 104), Revenue Recognition / ASC 605). Under this
standard, we recognize revenue when an arrangement exists, prices are determinable, collectability
is reasonably assured and the goods or services have been delivered.
We also enter into certain leasing arrangements with customers and evaluate the contracts in
accordance with FASB ASC Topic 840 Leases. Our accounting for equipment leases involves specific
determinations under the authoritative guidance, which often involve complex provisions and
significant judgments. In accordance with the authoritative guidance, we classify the transactions
as sales type or operating leases based on (1) review for transfers of ownership of the property
to the lessee by the end of the lease term, (2) review of the lease terms to determine if it
contains an option to purchase the leased property for a price which is sufficiently lower than the
expected fair value of the property at the date the option, (3) review of the lease term to
determine if it is equal to or greater than 75% of the economic life of the equipment and (4)
review of the present value of the minimum lease payments to determine if they are equal to or
greater than 90% of the fair market value of the equipment at the inception of the lease.
Additionally we consider the cancelability of the contract and any related uncertainty of
collections or risk in recoverability of the lease investment at lease inception. Revenue from
sales type leases is recognized at the inception of the lease or when the equipment has been
delivered and installed at the customer site, if installation is required. Revenues from equipment
rentals under operating leases are recognized as earned over the lease term, which is generally on
a straight-line basis.
27
When a sale involves multiple elements, such as sales of products that include services, the
entire fee from the arrangement is allocated to each respective element based on its relative fair
value in accordance with the authoritative guidance for accounting for multiple element revenue
arrangements (Emerging Issues Task Force 00-21 (EITF 00-21), Accounting for Multiple Element
Revenue Arrangements / ASC 605-25), and recognized when the applicable revenue recognition
criteria for each element have been met. The amount of product and service revenue recognized is
impacted by our judgments as to whether an arrangement includes multiple elements and, if so,
whether sufficient objective and reliable evidence of fair value exists for those elements. Changes
to the elements in an arrangement and our ability to establish evidence for those elements could
affect the timing of revenue recognition.
Collections in excess of revenues and deferred revenues represent cash collected from
customers in advance of revenue recognition and are recorded in accrued liabilities for obligations
within the next twelve months. Amounts for obligations extending beyond the twelve months are
recorded within other liabilities in the consolidated financial statements.
Accounting for stock-based compensation
We grant options to purchase our common stock and award restricted stock units to our
employees and directors under our equity compensation plans. Eligible employees can also purchase
shares of our common stock at 85% of the lower of the fair market value on the first or the last
day of each six-month offering period under our employee stock purchase plan. The benefits provided
under these plans are stock-based payments subject to the provisions of the authoritative guidance
for share-based payments (revised Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 123 (SFAS
123R), Share-Based Payment / ASC 718). Stock-based compensation expense recognized under the
authoritative guidance for share-based payments for the three months ended January 1, 2010 and
January 2, 2009 was $3.3 million and $2.5 million, respectively. Stock-based compensation expense
recognized under the authoritative guidance for share-based payments for the nine months ended
January 1, 2010 and January 2, 2009 was $8.4 million and $7.6 million, respectively.
Allowance for doubtful accounts
We make estimates of the collectability of our accounts receivable based on historical bad
debts, customer creditworthiness and current economic trends when evaluating the adequacy of the
allowance for doubtful accounts. Historically, our bad debt allowances have been minimal; a
contributing factor to this is that a significant portion of our sales has been to the U.S.
government. Our accounts receivable balance was $185.6 million, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $0.1 million, as of January 1, 2010, and $164.1 million, net of allowance for doubtful
accounts of $0.4 million, as of April 3, 2009.
Warranty reserves
We provide limited warranties on our products for periods of up to five years. We record a
liability for our warranty obligations when we ship the products or they are included in long-term
construction contracts based upon an estimate of expected warranty costs. Amounts expected to be
incurred within twelve months are classified as a current liability. For mature products, we
estimate the warranty costs based on historical experience with the particular product. For newer
products that do not have a history of warranty costs, we base our estimates on our experience with
the technology involved and the types of failures that may occur. It is possible that our
underlying assumptions will not reflect the actual experience, and in that case, we will make
future adjustments to the recorded warranty obligation.
Goodwill
We account for our goodwill under authoritative guidance for goodwill and other intangible
assets (SFAS 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets / ASC 350). The guidance (SFAS 142 / ASC
350) for goodwill impairment model is a two-step process. First, it requires a comparison of the
book value of net assets to the fair value of the reporting units that have goodwill assigned to
them. Reporting units within our government systems, commercial networks and satellite services
segments have goodwill assigned to them. If the fair value is determined to be less than book
value, a second step is performed to compute the amount of the impairment. In this process, a fair
value for goodwill is estimated, based in part on the fair value of the reporting unit used in the
first step, and is compared to its carrying value. The shortfall of the fair value below carrying
value, if any, represents the amount of goodwill impairment. We test goodwill for impairment during
the fourth quarter every fiscal year and when an event occurs or circumstances change such that it
is reasonably possible that an impairment may exist.
28
We estimate the fair values of the related operations using discounted cash flows and other
indicators of fair value. We base the forecast of future cash flows on our best estimate of the
future revenues and operating costs, which we derive primarily from existing firm orders, expected
future orders, contracts with suppliers, labor agreements and general market conditions. Changes in
these forecasts could cause a particular reporting unit to either pass or fail the first step in
the guidance (SFAS 142 / ASC 350) related to the goodwill impairment model, which could
significantly influence whether a goodwill impairment needs to be recorded. We adjust the cash flow
forecasts by an appropriate discount rate derived from our market capitalization plus a suitable
control premium at the date of evaluation. In applying the first step, which is identification of
any impairment of goodwill, no impairment of goodwill has resulted.
Property, equipment and satellites
Equipment, computers and software, furniture and fixtures, and our ViaSat-1 satellite under
construction are recorded at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Costs are capitalized as
incurred and for our satellite include construction, launch and insurance. Satellite construction
costs, including launch services and insurance, are generally procured under long-term contracts
that provide for payments by us over the contract periods. In addition, interest expense is
capitalized on the carrying value of the satellite during the construction period. Satellite
construction and launch services costs are capitalized to reflect progress toward completion, which
typically coincides with contract milestone payment schedules. Insurance premiums related to the
satellite launch and subsequent in-orbit testing are capitalized and amortized over the estimated
useful lives of the satellite. Performance incentives payable in future periods are dependent on
the continued satisfactory performance of the satellite in service.
As a result of the acquisition of WildBlue on December 15, 2009, we acquired the WildBlue-1
satellite (which was placed into service in March 2007) and an exclusive prepaid lifetime capital
lease of Ka-band capacity on Telesat Canadas Anik F2 satellite (which was placed into service in
April 2005). The acquired assets also included the indoor and outdoor customer premise equipment
(CPE) units leased to subscribers under WildBlues retail leasing program.
Impairment of long-lived assets (property, equipment and satellites, and other intangible assets)
In accordance with the authoritative guidance for impairment or disposal of long-lived assets
(SFAS 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets / ASC 360), we assess
potential impairments to our long-lived assets, including property, equipment and satellites and
other intangible assets, when there is evidence that events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying value may not be recoverable. We recognize an impairment loss when the
undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset (or group of assets) are less than the
assets carrying value. Any required impairment loss would be measured as the amount by which the
assets carrying value exceeds its fair value, and would be recorded as a reduction in the carrying
value of the related asset and charged to results of operations. We have not identified any such
impairment.
Income taxes and valuation allowance on deferred tax assets
Management evaluates the realizability of our deferred tax assets and assesses the need for a
valuation allowance on a quarterly basis. In accordance with the authoritative guidance for income
taxes (SFAS 109, Accounting for Income Taxes / ASC 740), net deferred tax assets are reduced by a
valuation allowance if, based on all the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some
or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
Management evaluates the realizability of our deferred tax assets and assesses the need for a
valuation allowance on a quarterly basis. In accordance with the authoritative guidance for
income taxes, net deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance if, based on all the
available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not
be realized. Our valuation allowance against deferred tax assets increased from $2.1 million at
April 3, 2009 to $10.9 million at January 1, 2010. The valuation allowance relates to state net
operating loss carryforwards and research credit carryforwards available to reduce state income
taxes. The increase in the valuation allowance was due to the acquisition of certain deferred tax
assets of WildBlue. The acquired deferred tax assets from WildBlue were recorded net of the
valuation allowance.
Accruals for uncertain tax positions are provided for in accordance with the authoritative
guidance for accounting for uncertainty in income taxes (Financial Accounting Standards Board
(FASB) Interpretation No. 48 (FIN 48), Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 / ASC 740). Under the guidance, we may recognize the tax
benefit
29
from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position
will be sustained on examination by the taxing
authorities, based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the
financial statements from such a position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has
a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. The guidance addresses
the derecognition of income tax assets and liabilities, classification of current and deferred
income tax assets and liabilities, accounting for interest and penalties associated with tax
positions, and income tax disclosures.
We are subject to income taxes in the United States and numerous foreign jurisdictions. In the
ordinary course of business, there are calculations and transactions where the ultimate tax
determination is uncertain. In addition, changes in tax laws and regulations as well as adverse
judicial rulings could adversely affect the income tax provision. We believe we have adequately
provided for income tax issues not yet resolved with federal, state and foreign tax authorities.
However, if these provided amounts prove to be more than what is necessary, the reversal of the
reserves would result in tax benefits being recognized in the period in which we determine that
provision for the liabilities is no longer necessary. If an ultimate tax assessment exceeds our
estimate of tax liabilities, an additional charge to expense would result.
Results of Operations
The following table presents, as a percentage of related revenues or total revenues, income
statement data for the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Nine months ended |
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
January 2, 2009 |
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
January 2, 2009 |
Revenues |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
|
|
100.0 |
% |
Product revenues |
|
|
87.7 |
|
|
|
93.9 |
|
|
|
92.1 |
|
|
|
94.5 |
|
Service revenues |
|
|
12.3 |
|
|
|
6.1 |
|
|
|
7.9 |
|
|
|
5.5 |
|
Operating expenses: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of product revenues |
|
|
72.0 |
|
|
|
71.4 |
|
|
|
70.6 |
|
|
|
71.6 |
|
Cost of service revenues |
|
|
60.4 |
|
|
|
51.5 |
|
|
|
65.5 |
|
|
|
64.1 |
|
Selling, general and
administrative |
|
|
22.0 |
|
|
|
15.9 |
|
|
|
19.0 |
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
Independent research and
development |
|
|
5.0 |
|
|
|
4.7 |
|
|
|
4.5 |
|
|
|
5.1 |
|
Amortization of
intangible assets |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from operations |
|
|
1.2 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
5.3 |
|
|
|
6.5 |
|
Income before income taxes |
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
|
7.7 |
|
|
|
4.9 |
|
|
|
6.7 |
|
Net income |
|
|
2.0 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
4.3 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Net income attributable
to ViaSat, Inc. |
|
|
2.1 |
|
|
|
7.1 |
|
|
|
4.4 |
|
|
|
5.7 |
|
Three Months Ended January 1, 2010 vs. Three Months Ended January 2, 2009
Product revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Product revenues |
|
$ |
137.1 |
|
|
$ |
141.2 |
|
|
$ |
(4.0 |
) |
|
|
(2.8 |
)% |
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
87.7 |
% |
|
|
93.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues decreased from $141.2 million to $137.1 million during the third quarter of
fiscal year 2010 when compared to the same period last year. The decrease is primarily related to a
$4.7 million reduction in government systems segment product revenues partially offset by an
increase of $0.8 million from the commercial networks segment. The product revenue decrease in our
government systems segment primarily resulted from lower product sales of $6.8 million in
next-generation tactical data link development and $1.3 million in video data link systems, offset
by higher product sales of $4.1 million in next-generation military satellite communication
systems. Our commercial networks segment product revenue increase was mainly due to higher product
sales of $6.6 million from our enterprise VSAT products and $4.7 million from our antenna systems
products, offset by a reduction in
30
product sales from our mobile satellite communications systems
of $5.4 million and $4.2 million from our consumer broadband products.
Service revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
19.2 |
|
|
$ |
9.2 |
|
|
$ |
10.0 |
|
|
|
108.8 |
% |
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
12.3 |
% |
|
|
6.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues increased from $9.2 million to $19.2 million primarily due to the acquisition
of WildBlue which contributed $9.0 million of service revenues in our satellite services segment in
the third quarter of fiscal year 2010, since the date of acquisition. The remainder of the service
revenue increase was primarily driven by mobile satellite services, which were also included in our
satellite services segment.
Cost of product revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Cost of product revenues |
|
$ |
98.7 |
|
|
$ |
100.8 |
|
|
$ |
(2.1 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
)% |
Percentage of product revenues |
|
|
72.0 |
% |
|
|
71.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our quarterly cost of product revenues decreased from $100.8 million to $98.7 million during
the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2009
primarily due to our decreased product revenues. Cost of product revenues as a percentage of
product revenues stayed relatively flat at 71.4% for the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 and
72.0% for the third quarter of fiscal year 2010. This was primarily a result of product cost
increases of approximately $2.2 million in our government systems segment mainly from lower margins
earned on next-generation tactical data link development programs, offset by product cost decreases
of approximately $0.9 million in our commercial networks segment mainly from enterprise VSAT
products. Cost of product revenues may fluctuate in future periods depending on the mix of products
sold, competition, new product introduction costs and other factors.
Cost of service revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Cost of service revenues |
|
$ |
11.6 |
|
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
$ |
6.9 |
|
|
|
144.9 |
% |
Percentage of service revenues |
|
|
60.4 |
% |
|
|
51.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our quarterly cost of service revenues increased from $4.7 million to $11.6 million during the
third quarter of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 primarily
due the service revenue increase from the acquisition of WildBlue included in our satellite
services segment. The remainder of the increase in cost of service revenues was primarily driven by
service cost increases in mobile satellite service development efforts also within our satellite
services segment. Cost of service revenues may fluctuate in future periods depending on the mix of
services provided, competition, new service introduction costs and other factors.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Selling, general
and administrative |
|
$ |
34.4 |
|
|
$ |
24.0 |
|
|
$ |
10.5 |
|
|
|
43.7 |
% |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
22.0 |
% |
|
|
15.9 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31
The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses (SG&A) of $10.5 million in
the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 was
primarily attributable to $4.6 million in transaction expenses incurred in connection with the
WildBlue acquisition and $5.0 million in SG&A attributable to WildBlue from the day of the
acquisition through the end of the quarter (of which $2.7 million related to certain
post-acquisition charges recorded for restructuring cost related to terminated employees). SG&A
expenses consisted primarily of personnel costs and expenses for business development, marketing
and sales, bid and proposal, facilities, finance, contract administration and general management.
Some SG&A expenses are difficult to predict and vary based on specific government, commercial and
satellite service sales opportunities.
Independent research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Independent
research and
development |
|
$ |
7.9 |
|
|
$ |
7.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
|
12.6 |
% |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
5.0 |
% |
|
|
4.7 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in independent, research and development (IR&D) expenses of approximately $0.9
million reflected a year-over-year third quarter increase in the commercial networks segment of
$1.7 million during the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the same period in
fiscal year 2009 and a decrease in the government systems segment of $0.9 million. The higher IR&D
expenses were principally due to increased IR&D related to next generation consumer broadband
products.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets. We amortize our acquired intangible assets from
prior acquisitions over their estimated useful lives ranging from eight months to ten years. The
decrease in amortization is due to the fact that certain acquired technology intangibles in our
commercial networks segment became fully amortized over the preceding twelve-months, offset
partially by amortization of approximately $0.5 million related to the new intangibles acquired as
a result of the WildBlue acquisition in December 2009. Current and expected amortization expense
for each of the following periods is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
For the nine months ended January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
4,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected for the remainder of fiscal year 2010 |
|
$ |
4,598 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2011 |
|
|
17,777 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2012 |
|
|
16,551 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2013 |
|
|
13,446 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2014 |
|
|
11,705 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
29,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income. The increase in interest income of $0.3 million quarter over quarter was
primarily due to slightly higher average interest rates on our investments and higher average
invested cash balances during the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the same
period last fiscal year.
Interest expense. The increase in interest expense of $2.0 million quarter over quarter was
primarily due to interest expense in connection with the Notes and our revolving credit facility
(the Credit Facility). We capitalized $3.8 million of interest expense associated with the
construction of our ViaSat-1 satellite during the three months ended January 1, 2010 compared to no
amounts capitalized during the corresponding period of the prior fiscal year. The amount of such
capitalized interest will depend on the carrying value of the ViaSat-1 satellite and the duration
of the construction phase of the project. We expect to incur significantly more interest expense as
a result of the issuance on October 22, 2009 of the Notes and will continue to capitalize
additional interest related to our ViaSat-1 satellite construction project.
Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes. The income tax benefit of $2.9 million for the third
quarter of fiscal 2010 was lower than the expected tax expense based on the 17.4% estimated annual
effective tax rate primarily due to the recognition of approximately $2.6
32
million of previously unrecognized tax benefits due to the expiration of the statute of
limitations for certain previously filed tax returns, partially offset by non-deductible
acquisition-related costs associated with our WildBlue acquisition. Our estimated annual effective
tax rate of approximately 17.4% for fiscal year 2010 reflects the expiration of the federal
research and development tax credit on December 31, 2009. If the federal research and development
tax credit is reinstated, we may have a lower annual effective tax rate and the amount of the tax
rate reduction will depend on the effective date of any such reinstatement, the terms of the
reinstatement as well as the amount of eligible research and development expenses in the reinstated
period.
Segment Results for the Three Months Ended January 1, 2010 vs. Three Months Ended January 2, 2009
Government systems segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
89.1 |
|
|
$ |
93.8 |
|
|
$ |
(4.7 |
) |
|
|
(5.0 |
)% |
The revenue decrease in our government systems segment was primarily derived from lower
product sales of $6.8 million in next-generation tactical data link development and $1.3 million in
video data link systems, offset by higher product sales of $4.1 million in next-generation military
satellite communication systems.
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Operating profit |
|
$ |
10.8 |
|
|
$ |
14.3 |
|
|
$ |
(3.5 |
) |
|
|
(24.4 |
)% |
Percentage of segment revenue |
|
|
12.1 |
% |
|
|
15.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in our government systems segment operating profit of $3.5 million during the
third quarter of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 was
primarily due to decreased revenues coupled with lower product contributions, resulting in higher
cost of revenues of approximately $2.2 million and also due to higher selling, support and new
business proposal costs of approximately $0.5 million.
Commercial networks segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
55.0 |
|
|
$ |
54.2 |
|
|
$ |
0.8 |
|
|
|
1.5 |
% |
Our commercial networks segment revenue increase was mainly due to higher product sales of
$6.6 million from our enterprise VSAT products and $4.7 million from our antenna systems products,
offset by a reduction in product sales of $5.4 million from our mobile satellite communications
systems and $4.2 million from our consumer broadband products.
33
Segment operating (loss) profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Operating (loss) profit |
|
$ |
(0.8 |
) |
|
$ |
0.1 |
|
|
$ |
(0.9 |
) |
|
|
(1,260.1 |
)% |
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
(1.5 |
)% |
|
|
0.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our commercial networks segment changed to an operating loss from an operating profit in the
third quarter of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the same period last fiscal year. This change
was primarily due to an increase in IR&D costs of approximately $1.8 million and higher selling,
support and new business proposal costs of $0.3 million, offset by increased revenues and related
product contributions of $1.2 million.
Satellite services segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
12.3 |
|
|
$ |
2.4 |
|
|
$ |
9.9 |
|
|
|
412.2 |
% |
Our satellite services segment revenue increase of approximately $9.9 million was primarily
attributable to the acquisition of WildBlue in December 2009, which contributed $9.0 million of
service revenues in our satellite services segment in the third quarter of fiscal year 2010, since
the date of acquisition. The remainder of the revenue increase in our satellite services segment
was primarily driven by mobile satellite services.
Segment operating loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Operating loss |
|
$ |
(6.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(0.4 |
) |
|
$ |
(5.7 |
) |
|
|
(1,333.2 |
)% |
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
(50.3 |
)% |
|
|
(18.0 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in satellite services segment operating loss of $5.7 million during the third
quarter of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the third quarter of fiscal year 2009 was primarily
due to the acquisition of WildBlue. We incurred $5.0 million in SG&A expenses in the WildBlue
business during the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 since the date of acquisition (of which $2.7
million related to certain post-acquisition charges recorded for restructuring costs related to
terminated employees) and incurred approximately $4.6 million in WildBlue transaction-related
expenses during the quarter, offset by WildBlue revenues and related product contributions of $3.8
million.
Nine Months Ended January 1, 2010 vs. Nine Months Ended January 2, 2009
Product revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Product revenues |
|
$ |
437.9 |
|
|
$ |
437.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.9 |
|
|
|
0.2 |
% |
Percentage
of total revenues |
|
|
92.1 |
% |
|
|
94.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Product revenues increased from $437.0 million to $437.9 million during the first nine months
of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the same period last year. Increased product revenues were
experienced in our government systems segment, which increased by $4.7 million, offset by a
decrease in our commercial networks segment of $3.7 million. Product revenue increases in our
government systems segment were primarily derived from higher product sales of $16.8 million in
next-generation military satellite communication systems, offset by lower product sales of $7.2
million in next-generation tactical data link development and $5.7 million in information assurance
products and development programs. Our commercial networks segment product revenue decrease was
mainly due to a reduction in sales of $12.1 million from our consumer broadband products and $6.0
million from our mobile satellite communications systems products, offset by higher sales of $10.5
million from our enterprise VSAT products and $3.4 million from our antenna systems products.
34
Service revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Service revenues |
|
$ |
37.5 |
|
|
$ |
25.6 |
|
|
$ |
11.9 |
|
|
|
46.5 |
% |
Percentage of total revenues |
|
|
7.9 |
% |
|
|
5.5 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service revenues increased from $25.6 million to $37.5 million primarily due to the
acquisition of WildBlue in December 2009 which contributed $9.0 million of service revenues in our
satellite services segment in the third quarter of fiscal year 2010. The remainder of the service
revenue increase was primarily driven by growth in our mobile satellite services revenues, which
are also included in our satellite services segment.
Cost of product revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Cost of product revenues |
|
$ |
309.1 |
|
|
$ |
312.7 |
|
|
$ |
(3.6 |
) |
|
|
(1.14 |
)% |
Percentage of product revenues |
|
|
70.6 |
% |
|
|
71.6 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our cost of product revenues decreased from $312.7 million to $309.1 million during the first
nine months of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the same period of fiscal year 2009. We
experienced a decrease in cost of product revenues as a percent of product revenues from 71.6% to
70.6%. This improvement was primarily due to product cost reductions of approximately $1.8 million
in our commercial networks segment mainly from our enterprise VSAT products and $0.9 million in our
government systems segment primarily from information assurance products and development programs,
offset by lower margins on video datalink systems. Cost of product revenues may fluctuate in future
periods depending on the mix of products sold, competition, new product introduction costs and
other factors.
Cost of service revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Cost of service revenues |
|
$ |
24.6 |
|
|
$ |
16.4 |
|
|
$ |
8.2 |
|
|
|
49.7 |
% |
Percentage of service revenues |
|
|
65.5 |
% |
|
|
64.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our cost of service revenues increased from $16.4 million to $24.6 million during the first
nine months of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the same period of fiscal year 2009 primarily due
the service revenue increase from the acquisition of WildBlue included in our satellite services
segment. The remainder of the increase in cost of service revenues was primarily driven by service
cost increases in mobile satellite service development efforts which are also within our satellite
services segment. Cost of service revenues may fluctuate in future periods depending on the mix of
services provided, competition, new service introduction costs and other factors.
Selling, general and administrative expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Selling, general and administrative |
|
$ |
90.3 |
|
|
$ |
73.0 |
|
|
$ |
17.3 |
|
|
|
23.7 |
% |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
19.0 |
% |
|
|
15.8 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in SG&A expenses of $17.3 million during the first nine months of fiscal year
2010 compared to the same period of fiscal year 2009 was primarily attributable to $7.1 million in
transaction expenses incurred in connection with the WildBlue acquisition, $5.0 million in SG&A
attributable to WildBlue since the date of acquisition (of which $2.7 million related to certain
post-
35
acquisition charges recorded for restructuring costs related to terminated employees),
increased support costs related to business growth of approximately $3.2 million and new business
proposal costs for new contract awards of approximately $3.2 million primarily in our government
systems segment, offset by lower selling costs of approximately $1.1 million mainly in our
commercial networks segment. SG&A expenses consisted primarily of personnel costs and expenses for
business development, marketing and sales, bid and proposal, facilities, finance, contract
administration and general management. Some SG&A expenses are difficult to predict and vary based
on specific government, commercial and satellite service sales opportunities.
Independent research and development
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Independent research and
development |
|
$ |
21.6 |
|
|
$ |
23.5 |
|
|
$ |
(1.9 |
) |
|
|
(8.2 |
)% |
Percentage of revenues |
|
|
4.5 |
% |
|
|
5.1 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The decrease in IR&D expenses of approximately $1.9 million reflected a year-over-year
decrease in the government systems segment of $2.2 million offset by an increase in the commercial
networks segment of $0.3 million for the first nine months of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the
same period in fiscal year 2009. The lower IR&D expenses were principally due to a shift of some
of our efforts from internal development projects to customer-funded development.
Amortization of acquired intangible assets. We amortize our acquired intangible assets from
prior acquisitions over their estimated useful lives ranging from eight months to ten years. The
decrease in amortization is due to the fact that certain acquired technology intangibles in our
commercial networks segment became fully amortized over the preceding twelve-month period, offset
partially by amortization of approximately $0.5 million related to new intangibles acquired as a
result of the WildBlue acquisition in December 2009. Current and expected amortization expense for
each of the following periods is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization |
|
|
|
(In thousands) |
|
For the nine months ended January 1, 2010 |
|
$ |
4,768 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected for the remainder of fiscal year 2010 |
|
$ |
4,598 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2011 |
|
|
17,777 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2012 |
|
|
16,551 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2013 |
|
|
13,446 |
|
Expected for fiscal year 2014 |
|
|
11,705 |
|
Thereafter |
|
|
29,880 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$ |
93,957 |
|
|
|
|
|
Interest income. The decrease in interest income of $0.8 million was primarily due to lower
interest rates on our investments and lower average invested cash balances.
Interest expense. The increase in interest expense of $2.2 million year over year was
primarily due to interest expense on the Notes and Credit Facility. We capitalized $5.0 million of
interest expense associated with the construction of our ViaSat-1 satellite during the nine months
ended January 1, 2010 compared to no amounts capitalized during the corresponding period of the
prior fiscal year. The amount of such capitalized interest will depend on the carrying value of the
ViaSat-1 satellite and the duration of the construction phase of the project. We expect to incur
significantly more interest expense as a result of the issuance on October 22, 2009 of the Notes
and will continue to capitalize additional interest related to our ViaSat-1 satellite construction
project.
Provision for Income Taxes. Our effective tax rate for the nine months ended January 1, 2010
was approximately 11.9%, as compared to the 17.4% estimated annual effective tax rate for fiscal
year 2010. The difference was primarily due to the recognition of approximately $2.6 million of
previously unrecognized tax benefits due to the expiration of the statute of limitations for
certain previously filed tax returns, partially offset by non-deductible acquisition-related costs
associated with the WildBlue acquisition. This compares to an effective tax rate of 15.5% for the
nine months ended January 2, 2009, which reflected the retroactive reinstatement of
36
the federal research and development tax credit during such fiscal period. Our estimated
annual effective tax rate of approximately 17.4% for fiscal year 2010 reflects the expiration of
the federal research and development tax credit on December 31, 2009. If the federal research and
development tax credit is reinstated, we may have a lower annual effective tax rate and the amount
of the tax rate reduction will depend on the effective date of any such reinstatement, the terms of
the reinstatement as well as the amount of eligible research and development expenses in the
reinstated period.
Segment Results for the Nine Months Ended January 1, 2010 vs. Nine Months Ended January 2, 2009
Government systems segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
284.5 |
|
|
$ |
279.7 |
|
|
$ |
4.7 |
|
|
|
1.7 |
% |
The revenue increase in our government systems segment was primarily derived from higher
product sales of $16.8 million in next-generation military satellite communication systems offset
by lower product sales of $7.2 million in next-generation tactical data link development and a
decrease in product sales of $5.7 million in information assurance products and development
programs.
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Operating profit |
|
$ |
37.2 |
|
|
$ |
39.6 |
|
|
$ |
(2.5 |
) |
|
|
(6.2 |
)% |
Percentage of segment revenue |
|
|
13.1 |
% |
|
|
14.2 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our government systems segment operating profits decreased $2.5 million for the first nine
months of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the first nine months of fiscal year 2009 primarily due
to higher selling and support costs of approximately $7.2 million which were offset by increased
revenues and related product contributions of approximately $2.5 million and lower IR&D costs of
approximately $2.2 million.
Commercial networks segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
172.7 |
|
|
$ |
176.4 |
|
|
$ |
(3.7 |
) |
|
|
(2.1 |
)% |
Our commercial networks segment revenue decrease was mainly due to a $12.1 million reduction
in consumer broadband product sales and a $6.0 million reduction in sales from our mobile satellite
communications systems products, offset by higher sales of $10.5 million from our enterprise VSAT
products and $3.4 million from our antenna systems products.
37
Segment operating profit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Operating profit |
|
$ |
3.0 |
|
|
$ |
0.6 |
|
|
$ |
2.3 |
|
|
|
369.0 |
% |
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
1.7 |
% |
|
|
0.4 |
% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Our commercial networks segment operating profit increased in the first nine months of fiscal
year 2010 when compared to the same period last fiscal year primarily due to product cost decreases
of approximately $1.8 million mainly from our enterprise VSAT products and a $1.6 million decrease
in selling, support and new business proposal costs, offset by $0.3 million increase in IR&D costs.
Satellite services segment
Revenues
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
increase |
|
increase |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
(decrease) |
|
(decrease) |
Revenues |
|
$ |
18.3 |
|
|
$ |
6.5 |
|
|
$ |
11.7 |
|
|
|
179.7 |
% |
Our satellite services segment revenue increase of approximately $11.7 million was primarily
due to the acquisition of WildBlue in December 2009, which contributed $9.0 million of service
revenues in the third quarter of fiscal year 2010 since the date of acquisition. The remainder of
the revenue increase in our satellite services segment is primarily driven by mobile satellite
services.
Segment operating loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended |
|
Dollar |
|
Percentage |
|
|
January 1, |
|
January 2, |
|
(increase) |
|
(increase) |
(In millions, except percentages) |
|
2010 |
|
2009 |
|
decrease |
|
decrease |
Operating loss |
|
$ |
(10.2 |
) |
|
$ |
(3.3 |
) |
|
$ |
(7.0 |
) |
|
|
(213.8 |
)% |
Percentage of segment revenues |
|
|
(55.9 |
)% |
|
|
(49.8 |
)% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in our satellite services segment operating loss of $7.0 million in the first
nine months of fiscal year 2010 when compared to the same period last fiscal year was primarily due
to approximately $7.1 million in transaction-related expenses incurred in connection with the
WildBlue acquisition and $5.0 million in SG&A expenses incurred by WildBlue during the third
quarter of fiscal year 2010 since the date of acquisition (of which $2.7 million related to certain
post-acquisition charges recorded for restructuring cost related to terminated employees), offset
by WildBlue revenues and related product contributions of $3.8 million.
Backlog
As reflected in the table below, both funded and firm backlog increased during the first nine
months of fiscal year 2010, primarily due to some expected large contract awards that we began
pursuing in fiscal year 2009 for which negotiations were completed in fiscal year 2010.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
January 1, 2010 |
|
|
April 3, 2009 |
|
|
|
(In millions) |
|
Firm backlog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Systems segment |
|
$ |
207.5 |
|
|
$ |
225.6 |
|
Commercial Networks segment |
|
|
242.4 |
|
|
|
238.7 |
|
Satellite Services segment |
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
478.7 |
|
|
$ |
474.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funded backlog |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Systems segment |
|
$ |
190.4 |
|
|
$ |
209.1 |
|
Commercial Networks segment |
|
|
242.4 |
|
|
|
187.1 |
|
Satellite Services segment |
|
|
28.8 |
|
|
|
10.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
461.6 |
|
|
$ |
406.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contract options |
|
$ |
28.1 |
|
|
$ |
25.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The firm backlog does not include contract options. Of the $478.7 million in firm backlog,
approximately $118.5 million is expected to be delivered during the remaining three months of
fiscal year 2010, and the balance is expected to be delivered in fiscal year 2011 and thereafter.
We include in our backlog only those orders for which we have accepted purchase orders.
38
Our total new awards were $157.1 million and $503.4 million for the three and nine months
ended January 1, 2010, respectively, compared to $143.1 million and $604.5 million for the three
and nine months ended January 2, 2009, respectively.
Backlog is not necessarily indicative of future sales. A majority of our contracts can be
terminated at the convenience of the customer. Orders are often made substantially in advance of
delivery, and our contracts typically provide that orders may be terminated with limited or no
penalties. In addition, purchase orders may present product specifications that would require us to
complete additional product development. A failure to develop products meeting such specifications
could lead to a termination of the related contract.
Firm backlog amounts as presented are comprised of funded and unfunded components. Funded
backlog represents the sum of contract amounts for which funds have been specifically obligated by
customers to contracts. Unfunded backlog represents future amounts that customers may obligate over
the specified contract performance periods. Our customers allocate funds for expenditures on
long-term contracts on a periodic basis. Our ability to realize revenues from contracts in backlog
is dependent upon adequate funding for such contracts. Although we do not control the funding of
our contracts, our experience indicates that actual contract fundings have ultimately been
approximately equal to the aggregate amounts of the contracts.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Overview
We have financed our operations to date primarily with cash flows from operations, bank line
of credit financing, debt financing and equity financing. During the third quarter of fiscal year
2010, we generated $413.6 million of net cash from financing activities, which included proceeds
for our issuance of the Notes and additional borrowings under our Credit Facility. The general
cash needs of our government systems, commercial networks and satellite services segments can vary
significantly and depend on the type and mix of contracts in backlog (i.e., product or service,
development or production, and timing of payments), the quality of the customer (i.e., government
or commercial, domestic or international), the duration of the contract and the timing of payment
milestones under our satellite construction and launch contracts. In addition, primarily within our government systems and commercial networks segments, program performance significantly impacts the timing and amount of cash flows. If a
program is performing and meeting its contractual requirements, then the cash flow requirements are
usually lower. The cash needs of the government systems segment tend to be more a function of the
type of contract rather than customer quality. Also, U.S. government procurement regulations tend
to restrict the timing of cash payments on the contract. In the commercial networks and satellite
services segments, our cash needs are driven primarily by the quality of the customer and the type
of contract. The quality of the customer can affect the specific contract cash flow and whether
financing instruments are required by the customer. In addition, the commercial networks and
satellite services financing environments tend to provide for more flexible payment terms with
customers, including advance payments.
Cash provided by operating activities for the first nine months of fiscal year 2010 was $57.9
million as compared to $31.5 million for the first nine months of fiscal year 2009. The $26.4
million increase in cash provided by operating activities for the first nine months of fiscal year
2010 as compared to the first nine months of fiscal year 2009 was primarily attributed to a
year-over-year net decrease in cash used for net operating assets of $34.4 million, offset by lower
year-over-year net income of $5.8 million. The net operating asset decrease was predominantly due
to an increase in our collections in excess of revenues included in accrued liabilities, which
increased $16.6 million from the prior fiscal year-end, offset by growth in our combined billed and
unbilled accounts receivable, net, which increased by approximately $10.1 million from the prior
fiscal year-end prior to the effect of the WildBlue acquisition. Receivables growth in the first nine months of fiscal year 2010 was largely due to the
timing of certain contract billing milestones on programs in both our commercial networks segment
and government systems segment.
Cash used in investing activities in the first nine months of fiscal year 2010 was $468.3
million as compared to $93.9 million for the first nine months of fiscal year 2009. The increase in
cash used in investing activities was primarily related to $378.0 million of net cash used for the
acquisition of WildBlue, offset by lower construction payments for ViaSat-1 of approximately $65.0
million and lower additional capital expenditures for equipment of approximately $20.4 million for
the first nine months of fiscal year 2010 compared to approximately $71.5 million and $19.2
million, respectively, for the same period of fiscal year 2009.
Cash provided by financing activities for the first nine months of fiscal year 2010 was $413.6
million as compared to $1.6 million for the first nine months of fiscal year 2009. The approximate
$411.9 million increase in cash inflows for the first nine months of
39
fiscal year 2010 compared to the same period of last fiscal year was primarily related to the
$271.6 million and $263.0 million in proceeds from borrowings under the Notes in October of 2009
and under our Credit Facility, respectively, offset by repayments under our Credit Facility of
$123.0 million and payment of debt issuance costs of $11.6 million. In addition, cash provided by
financing activities for both periods included cash received from stock option exercises, cash
inflows related to the incremental tax benefit from stock-based compensation and cash received from
employee stock purchase plan purchases. Cash provided by financing activities in the first nine
months of fiscal year 2010 was offset by the repurchase of common stock related to net share
settlement of certain employee tax liabilities in connection with the vesting of restricted stock
unit awards and debt issuance costs.
Satellite-related activities
In January 2008, we entered into several agreements with Space Systems/Loral, Inc. (SS/L),
Loral Space & Communications, Inc. (Loral) and Telesat Canada related to our anticipated
high-capacity satellite system. Under the satellite construction contract with SS/L, we purchased
ViaSat-1, a new high-capacity Ka-band spot-beam satellite designed by us and currently under
construction by SS/L for approximately $209.1 million, subject to purchase price adjustments based
on satellite performance. The total cost of the satellite is $246.0 million, but, as part of the
satellite purchase arrangements, Loral executed a separate contract with SS/L whereby Loral is
purchasing the Canadian beams on the ViaSat-1 satellite for approximately $36.9 million (15% of the
total satellite cost). We have entered into a beam sharing agreement with Loral, whereby Loral has
agreed to reimburse us for 15% of the total costs associated with launch and launch insurance,
which is estimated to be approximately $20.3 million, and in-orbit insurance and satellite
operating costs post launch.
In November 2008, we entered into a launch services agreement with Arianespace to procure
launch services for ViaSat-1 at a cost estimated to be $107.8 million, depending on the mass of the
satellite at launch. In March 2009, we substituted ILS International Launch Services, Inc. (ILS)
for Arianespace as the primary provider of launch services for ViaSat-1 and, accordingly, we
entered into a contract for launch services with ILS to procure launch services for ViaSat-1 at an
estimated cost of approximately $80.0 million, subject to certain adjustments, resulting in a net
savings of approximately $20.0 million.
On May 7, 2009, we entered into an Amended and Restated Launch Services Agreement with
Arianespace. Under the terms of the Amended and Restated Launch Services Agreement, Arianespace has
agreed to perform certain launch services to maintain the launch capability for ViaSat-1, should
the need arise, or for launch services of a future ViaSat satellite launch prior to December 2015.
This amendment and restatement also provides for certain cost adjustments depending on fluctuations
in foreign currencies, mass of the satellite launched and launch period timing.
The projected total cost of the ViaSat-1 project, including the satellite, launch, insurance
and related gateway infrastructure, through in-service of the satellite is estimated to be
approximately $400.0 million, excluding capitalized interest, and will depend on the timing of the
gateway infrastructure roll-out, among other things. However, we anticipate capitalizing certain
amounts of interest expense related to our outstanding borrowings in connection with our capital
projects under construction, such as construction of ViaSat-1 and related gateways. We continually
evaluate alternative strategies that would limit our total required investment. We believe we have
adequate sources of funding for the project, which includes our cash on hand, the cash we expect to
generate from operations over the next few years, and additional borrowing ability based on our
financial position and debt leverage ratio. We believe this provides us flexibility to execute this
project in an appropriate manner and/or obtain outside equity under terms that we consider
reasonable.
Senior notes due 2016
On October 22, 2009, we issued $275.0 million in principal amount of Notes in a private placement to institutional
buyers. The Notes bear interest at the rate of 8.875% per year, payable semi-annually in cash in
arrears commencing in March 2010 and were issued with an original issue discount of 1.24% or, $3.4
million. The Notes are recorded as long-term debt, net of original issue discount, in our
consolidated financial statements. The original issue discount and deferred financing cost
associated with the issuance of the Notes are amortized to interest expense over the term of the
Notes.
The Notes are guaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by each of our existing and future
subsidiaries that guarantees the Credit Facility. The Notes and the guarantees are our and the
guarantors general senior unsecured obligations and rank equally in right of payment with all of
their existing and future unsecured unsubordinated debt. The Notes and the guarantees are
effectively junior in right of payment to their existing and future secured debt, including under
the Credit Facility (to the extent of the value of the assets
40
securing such debt), are structurally subordinated to all existing and future liabilities
(including trade payables) of our subsidiaries that are not guarantors of the Notes, and are senior
in right of payment to all of their existing and future subordinated indebtedness.
The indenture governing the Notes limits, among other things, our and our restricted
subsidiaries ability to: incur, assume or guarantee additional debt; issue redeemable stock and
preferred stock; pay dividends, make distributions or redeem or repurchase capital stock; prepay,
redeem or repurchase subordinated debt; make loans and investments; grant or incur liens; restrict
dividends, loans or asset transfers from restricted subsidiaries; sell or otherwise dispose of
assets; enter into transactions with affiliates; reduce our satellite insurance; and consolidate or
merge with, or sell substantially all of their assets to, another person.
Prior to September 15, 2012, we may redeem up to 35% of the Notes at a redemption price of
108.875% of the principal amount thereof, plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the
redemption date, from the net cash proceeds of specified equity offerings. Prior to September 15,
2012, we may also redeem the Notes, in whole or in part, at a redemption price equal to 100% of the
principal amount thereof plus the applicable premium and any accrued and unpaid interest, if any,
thereon to the redemption date. The applicable premium is calculated as the greater of: (i) 1.0% of
the principal amount of such Notes and (ii) the excess, if any, of (a) the present value at such
date of redemption of (1) the redemption price of such notes on September 15, 2012 plus (2) all
required interest payments due on such Notes through September 15, 2012 (excluding accrued but
unpaid interest to the date of redemption), computed using a discount rate equal to the Treasury
Rate plus 50 basis points, over (b) the then-outstanding principal amount of such Notes. The Notes
may be redeemed, in whole or in part, at any time during the twelve months beginning on September
15, 2012 at a redemption price of 106.656%, during the twelve months beginning on September 15,
2013 at a redemption price of 104.438%, during the twelve months beginning on September 15, 2014 at
a redemption price of 102.219%, and at any time on or after September 12, 2015 at a redemption
price of 100%, in each case plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, thereon to the redemption
date.
In the event a change of control occurs (as defined under the indenture), each holder will
have the right to require us to repurchase all or any part (equal to $2,000 or larger integral
multiples of $1,000) of such holders Notes at a purchase price in cash equal to 101% of the
aggregate principal amount of the Notes repurchased plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to
the date of purchase (subject to the right of holders of record on the relevant record date to
receive interest due on the relevant interest payment date).
In connection with the private placement of the Notes, we entered into a registration rights
agreement with the initial purchasers in which we agreed to file a registration statement with the
SEC to permit the holders to exchange or resell the Notes. We must use commercially reasonable
efforts to consummate an exchange offer within 365 days after the issuance of the Notes or, under
certain circumstances, to prepare and file a shelf registration statement to cover the resale of
the Notes. If we do not comply with certain of their obligations under the registration rights
agreement, the registration rights agreement provides that additional interest will accrue on the
principal amount of the Notes at a rate of 0.25% per annum during the 90-day period immediately
following such default and will increase by 0.25% per annum at the end of each subsequent 90-day
period, but in no event will the penalty rate exceed 1.00% per annum.
Credit Facility and liquidity
We invest our cash in excess of current operating requirements in short-term,
interest-bearing, investment-grade securities. At January 1, 2010, we had $67.1 million in cash and
cash equivalents, $227.5 million in working capital and $140.0 million in principal amount outstanding
under our Credit Facility. At April 3, 2009, we had $63.5 million in cash and cash equivalents,
$203.4 million in working capital and no outstanding borrowings under our Credit Facility. Our cash
and cash equivalents are held in accounts managed by third party financial institutions. To date,
we have experienced no loss of access to our cash equivalents; however, there can be no assurance
that access to our cash and cash equivalents will not be impacted by adverse conditions in the
financial markets.
The Credit Facility, as amended, provides a revolving line of credit of $210.0 million
(including up to $25.0 million of letters of credit), which matures on July 1, 2012. Borrowings
under the Credit Facility bear interest, at our option, at either (1) the highest of the Federal
Funds rate plus 0.50%, Eurodollar rate plus 1.00% or the administrative agents prime rate as
announced from time to time, or (2) at the Eurodollar rate plus, in the case of each of (1) and
(2), an applicable margin that is based on the ratio of our debt to earnings before interest,
taxes, depreciation and amortization (EBITDA). At January 1, 2010, the effective interest rate on
our outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was 4.25%. We anticipate capitalizing certain
amounts of interest expense on our Credit Facility in connection with the construction of ViaSat-1.
The Credit Facility is guaranteed by certain of our domestic subsidiaries and collateralized by
substantially all of our respective assets.
41
At January 1, 2010 we had $140.0 million in principal amount of outstanding borrowings
under the Credit Facility and $12.2 million outstanding under standby letters of credit, leaving
borrowing availability under the Credit Facility of $57.8 million.
The Credit Facility contains financial covenants regarding a maximum leverage ratio, a maximum
senior secured leverage ratio and a minimum interest coverage ratio. In addition, the Credit
Facility contains covenants that restrict, among other things, our ability to sell assets, make
investments and acquisitions, make capital expenditures, grant liens, pay dividends and make
certain other restricted payments. On December 14, 2009, we amended the Credit
Facility to clarify the calculation of EBITDA following the completion of the WildBlue
acquisition.
To further enhance our liquidity position, we may obtain additional financing, which could
consist of debt, convertible debt or equity financing from public and/or private capital markets.
In April 2007, we filed an additional universal shelf registration statement with the SEC for the
future sale of up to an additional $200.0 million of debt securities, common stock, preferred
stock, depositary shares and warrants, bringing the aggregate available under our universal shelf
registration statements to up to $400.0 million. The securities may be offered from time to time,
separately or together, directly by us or through underwriters at amounts, prices, interest rates
and other terms to be determined at the time of the offering.
Our future capital requirements will depend upon many factors, including the timing and amount
of cash required for the ViaSat-1 satellite project pursuant to our contractual commitments, other
future broadband satellite projects we may engage in, expansion of our research and development and
marketing efforts, and the nature and timing of orders. Additionally, we will continue to evaluate
possible acquisitions of, or investments in complementary businesses, products and technologies
which may require the use of cash. We believe that our current cash balances and net cash expected
to be provided by operating activities along with availability under our Credit Facility will be
sufficient to meet our anticipated operating requirements for at least the next twelve months.
Contractual Obligations
The following table sets forth a summary of our obligations at January 1, 2010:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
remainder of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
fiscal year |
|
|
For the fiscal years ending |
|
(In thousands) |
|
Total |
|
|
2010 |
|
|
2011-2012 |
|
|
2013-2014 |
|
|
Thereafter |
|
Operating leases and satellite capacity agreements |
|
$ |
139,625 |
|
|
$ |
6,160 |
|
|
$ |
47,448 |
|
|
$ |
42,218 |
|
|
$ |
43,799 |
|
The Notes (1) |
|
|
438,725 |
|
|
|
6,102 |
|
|
|
48,813 |
|
|
|
48,813 |
|
|
|
334,997 |
|
Line of credit |
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
140,000 |
|
|
|
|
|
Standby letters of credit |
|
|
12,155 |
|
|
|
4,539 |
|
|
|
7,616 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase commitments including satellite-related agreements |
|
|
445,278 |
|
|
|
73,762 |
|
|
|
182,153 |
|
|
|
45,922 |
|
|
|
143,441 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
$ |
1,175,783 |
|
|
$ |
90,563 |
|
|
$ |
286,030 |
|
|
$ |
276,953 |
|
|
$ |
522,237 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) |
|
Includes total interest payments on
the Notes of $6.1 million for the
remainder of fiscal year 2010, $48.8
million in fiscal 2011-2012, $48.8
million in fiscal 2013-2014 and $60.0
million thereafter. |
We purchase components from a variety of suppliers and use several subcontractors and
contract manufacturers to provide design and manufacturing services for our products. During the
normal course of business, we enter into agreements with subcontractors, contract manufacturers and
suppliers that either allow them to procure inventory based upon criteria defined by us or that
establish the parameters defining our requirements. We have also entered into agreements with
suppliers for the construction, operation and launch of ViaSat-1.
In addition, we have contracted for an additional launch which can be used as a back-up launch
for ViaSat-1 or for a future satellite. In certain instances, these agreements allow us the option
to cancel, reschedule and adjust our requirements based on our business needs prior to firm orders
being placed. Consequently, only a portion of our reported purchase commitments arising from these
agreements are firm, non-cancelable and unconditional commitments.
Our condensed consolidated balance sheets included $31.3 million and $24.7 million of other
liabilities as of January 1, 2010 and April 3, 2009, respectively, which primarily consists of our
long-term warranty obligations, deferred lease credits, long-term portion of deferred revenue and
long-term unrecognized tax position liabilities. These remaining liabilities have been excluded
from the above table as the timing and/or the amount of any cash payment is uncertain. See Note 10
of the notes to condensed consolidated
42
financial statements for additional information regarding
our income taxes and related tax positions and Note 8 for a discussion of our product warranties.
Recent Authoritative Guidance
In June 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which amends the consolidation guidance
applicable to variable interest entities SFAS 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46R
(SFAS 167). The guidance will affect the overall consolidation analysis under the current
authoritative guidance for consolidation of variable interest entities (FIN 46R / ASC 810) and is
effective for us as of the beginning of the first quarter of fiscal year 2011. We are currently
evaluating the impact that the guidance may have on our consolidated financial statements and
disclosures.
In October 2009, the FASB issued authoritative guidance for revenue recognition with multiple
deliverables (EITF 08-1, Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables). This new guidance
impacts the determination of when the individual deliverables included in a multiple-element
arrangement may be treated as separate units of accounting. Additionally, this guidance modifies
the manner in which the transaction consideration is allocated across the separately identified
deliverables by no longer permitting the residual method of allocating arrangement consideration.
This guidance will be effective for us beginning in the first quarter of fiscal year 2012, however
early adoption is permitted. We are currently evaluating the impact that the guidance may have on
our consolidated financial statements and disclosures.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We had no material off-balance sheet arrangements at January 1, 2010 as defined in Regulation
S-K Item 303(a)(4) other than as discussed under Contractual Obligations above or disclosed in the
notes to our financial statements included in this Quarterly Report or in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended April 3, 2009.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest rate risk
Our financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, trade accounts receivable,
accounts payable, and short-term and long-term obligations, including the Credit Facility and the
Notes. We consider investments in highly liquid instruments purchased with a remaining maturity of
90 days or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. As of January 1, 2010, we had
$140.0 million and $275.0 million in principal amount of outstanding borrowings under our Credit
Facility and Notes, respectively, and we held no short-term investments. Our exposure to market
risk for changes in interest rates relates primarily to borrowings under our Credit Facility, cash
equivalents, short-term investments and short-term obligations, as our Notes bear interest at a
fixed rate.
The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal while at the same
time maximizing the income we receive from our investments without significantly increasing risk.
To minimize this risk, we maintain a significant portion of our cash balance in money market funds.
In general, money market funds are not subject to interest rate risk because the interest paid on
such funds fluctuates with the prevailing interest rate. Our cash and cash equivalents earn
interest at variable rates. Given recent declines in interest rates, our interest income has been
and may continue to be negatively impacted. Fixed rate securities may have their fair market value
adversely impacted due to a rise in interest rates, while floating rate securities may produce less
income than expected if interest rates fall. If the underlying weighted average interest rate on
our cash and cash equivalents, assuming balances remain constant over a year, changed by 50 basis
points, interest income would have increased or decreased by approximately $0.3 million. Because
our investment policy restricts us to invest in conservative, interest-bearing investments and
because our business strategy does not rely on generating material returns from our investment
portfolio, we do not expect our market risk exposure on our investment portfolio to be material.
As of January 1, 2010, we had $140.0 million in principal amount of outstanding borrowings
under our Credit Facility. Our primary interest rate under the Credit Facility is the Eurodollar
rate plus an applicable margin that is based on the ratio of our debt to EBITDA. As of January 1,
2010, the effective interest rate on our outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was
4.25%. Assuming the outstanding balance remained constant over a year, a 50 basis point increase in
the interest rate would increase interest incurred prior to effects of capitalized interest and
cash flow by approximately $0.7 million.
43
Foreign exchange risk
We generally conduct our business in U.S. dollars. However, as our international business is
conducted in a variety of foreign currencies and we pay some of our vendors in Euros, we are
exposed to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Our objective in managing our exposure
to foreign currency exchanges is to reduce earnings and cash flow volatility associated with
foreign exchange rate fluctuations. Accordingly, from time to time, we may enter into foreign
exchange contracts to mitigate risks associated with foreign currency denominated assets,
liabilities, commitments and anticipated foreign currency transactions.
As of January 1, 2010, we had no foreign currency exchange contracts outstanding.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance of
achieving the objective that information in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified and pursuant to the requirements of the
SECs rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management,
including our Chief Executive Officer, CEO, and Chief Financial Officer, CFO, as appropriate to
allow for timely decision regarding required disclosures. We carried out an evaluation, with the
participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO, of the effectiveness of our disclosure
controls and procedures as of January 1, 2010, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly
Report. Based on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of January 1, 2010.
During the period covered by this Quarterly Report, there have been no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
From time to time, we are involved in a variety of claims, suits, investigations and
proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, including actions with respect to
intellectual property claims, breach of contract claims, labor and employment claims, tax and other
matters. Although claims, suits, investigations and proceedings are inherently uncertain and their
results cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the resolution of our current pending
matters will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations or liquidity. Regardless of the outcome, litigation can have an adverse impact on us
because of defense costs, diversion of management resources and other factors. In addition, it is
possible that an unfavorable resolution of one or more such proceedings could in the future
materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations or
liquidity in a particular period.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
In addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should carefully
consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1A, Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended April 3, 2009 and in our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended October 2, 2009, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, liquidity
or future results. There have been no material changes to these risk factors, other than the
addition of and changes to the risk factors relating to our satellite services segment and our
acquisition of WildBlue, which have been updated to reflect the consummation of the WildBlue
acquisition in December 2009. The risks described in our reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q are not the
only risks facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that
we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial
condition, liquidity or future results.
Owning and Operating Satellites Involve Considerable Risks
In December 2009, we acquired WildBlue and as a result of such acquisition we now own and
operate WildBlues Ka-band satellite (WildBlue-1) and hold an exclusive lifetime lease of Ka-band
capacity on Telesat Canadas Anik F2 satellite in the contiguous United States. In January 2008, we
executed an agreement to purchase ViaSat-1, our new high-capacity broadband
satellite. We currently plan to launch ViaSat-1 in early 2011 and introduce service on this
satellite later in 2011. We may acquire or
44
use one or more additional satellites in the future. We
also plan to develop next generation broadband ground infrastructure and terminals for use with
these satellites. If we are unable to continue to operate WildBlue-1, or have manufactured or
successfully launch a satellite in a timely manner or at all, as a result of any of the following
risks or otherwise, we may be unable to realize the anticipated benefits from our satellite and
associated services business, and our business, financial condition and results of operations could
be materially adversely affected:
Business Plan. We may be unsuccessful in implementing our business plan for the WildBlue
business and our satellite services segment as a whole, or we may not be able to achieve the
revenue that we expect from our satellite services segment. A failure to attract a sufficient
number of distributors or customers would result in lower revenues than anticipated.
In-Orbit Risks. The existing satellites supporting our WildBlue business are, and any future
satellite we acquire will be, subject to potential satellite failures or performance
degradations. Satellites are subject to in-orbit risks including malfunctions, commonly referred
to as anomalies, interference from electrostatic storms, and collisions with meteoroids,
decommissioned spacecraft or other space debris. Anomalies occur as a result of various factors,
such as satellite manufacturing errors, problems with the power systems or control systems of the
satellites and general failures resulting from operating satellites in the harsh environment of
space. To the extent there is an anomaly or other in-orbit failure with respect to WildBlue-1,
Anik F2, ViaSat-1 or any other satellite we may acquire or use, this could have a material
adverse effect on our operations and our relationships with current customers and distributors,
and we may not have or be able to finance or procure a replacement satellite or backup
transponder capacity on reasonable economic terms or at all.
Cost and Schedule Risks. The cost of completing satellites and developing the associated next
generation SurfBeam 2® ground infrastructure may be more than we anticipated and there may be
delays in completing satellites and SurfBeam 2 infrastructure within the expected timeframe. We
may be required to spend in excess of our current forecast for the completion, launch and launch
insurance of ViaSat-1, or for the development associated with the SurfBeam 2 equipment. The
construction and launch of satellites are often subject to delays, including satellite and launch
vehicle construction delays, cost overruns, periodic unavailability of reliable launch
opportunities and delays in obtaining regulatory approvals. If the satellite construction
schedule is not met, there may be even further delays because there can be no assurance that a
launch opportunity will be available at the time the satellite is ready to be launched, and we
may not be able to obtain or maintain regulatory authority or International Telecommunication
Union (ITU) priority necessary to implement the satellite as proposed.
Launch Risks. There are risks associated with the launch of satellites, including launch
failure, damage or destruction during launch and improper orbital placement. Launch vehicles may
under-perform, in which case the satellite may still be placed into service by using its onboard
propulsion systems to reach the desired orbital location, resulting in a reduction in its service
life. Launch failures result in significant delays in the deployment of satellites because of the
need both to construct replacement satellites, which can take up to 36 months, and obtain other
launch opportunities. The overall historical loss rate in the satellite industry for all launches
of commercial satellites in fixed orbits in the last five years is estimated by some industry
participants to be approximately 10% but could at any time be higher.
Satellite Life. Our ability to earn revenue depends on the usefulness of WildBlue-1, ViaSat-1,
Anik F2 and any other satellite we may acquire in the future. Each satellite has a limited useful
life. The period of time during which a satellite is expected to function in accordance with its
specifications is referred to as such satellites design life. The design life of ViaSat-1 is 15
years from launch. The design life of WildBlue-1 was 12 years from launch, ending in 2018, and
the design life of Telesat Canadas Anik F2 satellite was 15 years from launch, ending in 2019. A
number of factors affect the useful lives of the satellites, including, among other things, the
quality of their design and construction, the durability of their component parts and back-up
units, the ability to continue to maintain proper orbit and control over the satellites
functions, the efficiency of the launch vehicle used, the remaining on-board fuel following orbit
insertion, the occurrence of any anomaly or series of anomalies affecting the satellite, and the
launch risks and in-orbit risks described above. There can be no assurance that the actual useful
life of ViaSat-1, WildBlue-1, Anik F2 or any other satellite that we may acquire will equal its
design life. In addition, continued improvements in satellite technology may make obsolete
ViaSat-1 or any other satellite we may acquire prior to the end of its life.
Insurance Risks. We currently hold in-orbit insurance for WildBlue-1 and Anik F2, and intend to
seek launch and in-orbit insurance for ViaSat-1 and for any other satellite we may acquire, but
we may not be able to obtain insurance, or renew existing insurance, on reasonable economic terms
or at all. If we are able to obtain or renew our insurance, it will contain customary exclusions
and will not likely cover the full cost of constructing and launching or replacing the
satellites, nor will it cover business
interruptions or similar losses. In addition, the occurrence of any anomalies on other
satellites, including other Ka-band satellites,
45
or any failures of a satellite using similar
components or failures of a similar launch vehicle to the launch vehicle we expect to use to
launch ViaSat-1, may materially adversely affect our ability to insure the satellites at
commercially reasonable premiums, if at all.
Joint Venture Risks. We may own or operate future satellites through joint ventures which we do
not control. If we were to enter into any such joint venture, we would be exposed to certain
risks and uncertainties, including the risk of the joint venture or applicable entity failing to
satisfy its obligations, which may result in certain liabilities to us for guarantees and other
commitments, challenges in achieving strategic objectives and expected benefits of the business
arrangement, the risk of conflicts arising between us and our partners and the difficulty of
managing and resolving such conflicts, and the difficulty of managing or otherwise monitoring
such business arrangements. In addition, our operating results would be affected by the
performance of businesses over which we do not exercise unilateral control and, if any other
members of such joint venture were to file for bankruptcy or otherwise fail to perform its
obligations or to manage the joint venture effectively, this could cause us to lose our
investment in any such joint venture entity.
We May be Unable to Obtain or Maintain Required Authorizations or Contractual Arrangements
Governmental authorizations are required in connection with the products and services that we
provide. In order to maintain these authorizations, compliance with specific conditions of those
authorizations, certain laws and regulations, and the payment of annual regulatory fees may be
required. Failure to comply with such requirements, or comply in a timely manner, could lead to the
loss of such authorizations and could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial
condition or results of operations. We currently hold authorizations to, among other things,
operate various satellite earth stations, including but not limited to user terminals, gateway
facilities, and network hubs. While we anticipate that these licenses will be renewed in the
ordinary course, or replaced by licenses covering more advanced facilities, we can provide no
assurance that this will be the case. The inability to timely obtain required authorizations for
future operations could delay or preclude our provision of new products and services. Further,
changes to the regulations under which we operate could adversely affect our ability to obtain or
maintain authorizations. Either circumstance could have a material adverse impact on our business.
Our operations also rely upon authorizations held by other entities, with which we have
contractual arrangements. The failure of those entities to maintain their respective
authorizations, or the termination or expiration of our contractual arrangements with those
entities, could have a material adverse impact on our business. For example, in order to provide
our WildBlue service, we use Ka-band capacity on the Anik F2 satellite under an agreement with
Telesat Canada, and we may do so until the end of the useful life of that satellite. Telesat Canada
operates that satellite under authority granted to it by the government of Canada. We also
currently use the WildBlue-1 satellite, which we own, and which is co-located with Anik F2 under
authority granted to Telesat Canada by the government of Canada, and pursuant to an agreement we
have with Telesat Canada that expires upon the end of the useful life of Anik F2. While the end of
useful life of Anik F2 is not expected to occur before 2019, there can be no assurance that will be
the case. We also intend to use our ViaSat-1 satellite, which is expected to be launched in 2011,
to provide WildBlue service. That satellite will operate under authority granted to ManSat Limited
by the governments of the Isle of Man and the United Kingdom, and pursuant to contractual
arrangements we have with ManSat Limited that extend past the expected useful life of ViaSat-1. The
failure of Telesat Canada or ManSat Limited to maintain their respective authorizations, or the
termination or expiration of our contractual arrangements with those entities (including as a
result of the premature end of life of Anik F2), could require us to seek alternative satellite
capacity for our customers, which may not be available, or which may require the costly and
time-consuming process of repointing the antennas of our customers.
A Significant Portion of Our Revenues Is Derived from a Few of Our Contracts
A small number of our contracts account for a significant percentage of our revenues. Our
largest revenue producing contracts are related to our tactical data links products, including our
Multifunctional Information Distribution System (MIDS) terminals, which generated approximately 21%
of our revenues in fiscal year 2009, 24% of our revenues in fiscal year 2008 and 23% of our
revenues in fiscal year 2007. Our five largest contracts generated approximately 35% of our
revenues in fiscal year 2009, 44% of our revenues in fiscal year 2008 and 46% of our revenues in
fiscal year 2007. Further, we derived approximately 6% of our revenues in fiscal year 2009, 7% of
our revenues in fiscal year 2008 and 15% of our revenues in fiscal year 2007 from sales of
enterprise communications networks. The failure of these customers to place additional orders or to
maintain these contracts with us for any reason, including any downturn in their business or
financial condition or our inability to renew our contracts with these customers or obtain new
contracts when they expire, could materially harm our business and impair the value of our common
stock. WildBlue, which we acquired in December 2009, generated approximately 8% of our revenues in
fiscal year 2009 in its capacity as our customer.
46
A number of our commercial customers have in the past, and may in the future, experience
financial difficulties. Many of our commercial customers face risks that are similar to those we
encounter, including risks associated with market growth, product defects, acceptance by the market
of products and services, and the ability to obtain sufficient capital. Further, many of our
customers that provide satellite-based services (including Telesat, Intelsat, Thaicom and Eutelsat)
could be materially affected by a satellite failure as well as by partial satellite failure,
satellite performance degradation, satellite manufacturing errors and other failures resulting from
operating satellites in the harsh environment of space. We cannot assure you that our customers
will be successful in managing these risks. If our customers do not successfully manage these types
of risks, it could impair our ability to generate revenues and collect amounts due from these
customers and materially harm our business. Major communications infrastructure programs, such as
proposed satellite communications systems, are important sources of our current and planned future
revenues. We also participate in a number of defense programs. Programs of these types often cannot
proceed unless the customer can raise substantial funds from either governmental or private
sources. As a result, our expected revenues can be adversely affected by political developments or
by conditions in private and public capital markets. They can also be adversely affected if capital
markets are not receptive to a customers proposed business plans.
Satellite Failures or Degradations in Satellite Performance Could Affect Our Business, Financial
Condition and Results of Operations
We utilize capacity on our WildBlue-1 satellite and Telesat Canadas Anik F2 satellite to
support our WildBlue® service. Satellites are subject to in-orbit risks including malfunctions,
commonly referred to as anomalies, interference from electrostatic storms, and collisions with
meteoroids, decommissioned spacecraft or other space debris. Anomalies occur as a result of various
factors, such as satellite manufacturing errors, problems with the power systems or control systems
of the satellites and general failures resulting from operating satellites in the harsh environment
of space. If any of the foregoing were to occur on either WildBlue-1 or Anik F2, this could have a
material adverse effect on our operations, our ability to generate revenues in our satellite
services segment, and our relationships with current customers and distributors, as well as our
ability to attract new customers for our satellite broadband services. Anomalies may also reduce
the expected useful life of a satellite, thereby creating additional expenses due to the need to
provide replacement or backup capacity and potentially reduce revenues if service is interrupted on
the satellites we utilize. We may not be able to obtain backup transponder capacity or a
replacement satellite on reasonable economic terms or at all. In addition, an increased frequency
of anomalies could impact market acceptance of our services.
The Markets We Serve Are Highly Competitive and Our Competitors May Have Greater Resources than Us
The wireless and satellite communications and secure networking industries are highly
competitive and competition is increasing. In addition, because the markets in which we operate are
constantly evolving and characterized by rapid technological change, it is difficult for us to
predict whether, when and who may introduce new competing technologies, products or services into
our markets. Currently, we face substantial competition from domestic and international wireless,
satellite and terrestrial-based communications service providers in the commercial and government
industries, including BAE Systems, General Dynamics, Gilat, Harris, Hughes Communications, iDirect
Technologies, L-3 Communications and Rockwell Collins. Many of our competitors and potential
competitors have significant competitive advantages, including strong customer relationships, more
experience with regulatory compliance, greater financial and management resources, control over
central communications networks and access to technologies not available to us. In addition, some
of our customers continuously evaluate whether to develop and manufacture their own products and
could elect to compete with us at any time. Our ability to compete may be adversely affected by
limits on our capital resources and our ability to invest in maintaining and expanding our market
share.
Any Failure to Successfully Integrate our WildBlue Acquisition and any future Strategic
Acquisitions Could Adversely Affect Our Business
Our future performance will depend in part on whether we can successfully integrate our
recently acquired WildBlue business with our satellite services segment in an effective and
efficient manner. Integrating our satellite services segment with the WildBlue business will be a
complex, time-consuming and expensive process and involve a number of risks and uncertainties. In
addition, in order to position ourselves to take advantage of growth opportunities, we have made,
and may continue to make, other strategic acquisitions that involve significant risks and
uncertainties. Such risks and uncertainties include:
the difficulty in integrating the WildBlue business and any other newly acquired businesses and
operations in an efficient and
effective manner;
47
the challenges in achieving strategic objectives, cost savings and other benefits expected from
the WildBlue acquisition and any future acquisitions;
the risk of diverting our resources and the attention of our senior management from the
operations of our business;
additional demands on management related to the increase in the size and scope of our company
following the acquisition;
the risk our markets do not evolve as anticipated and the technologies acquired do not prove to
be those needed to be successful in those markets;
difficulties in combining corporate cultures;
difficulties in the assimilation and retention of key employees;
difficulties in maintaining relationships with present and potential customers, distributors
and suppliers of the acquired business;
costs and expenses associated with any undisclosed or potential liabilities of WildBlue or any
future acquired business;
difficulties in converting the acquired business information systems to our systems;
difficulties in the integration, assimilation, implementation or modification of platforms,
systems, functions, technologies and infrastructure to support the combined business, as well as
maintaining uniform standards, controls (including internal accounting controls), procedures and
policies;
the risks of entering markets in which we have less experience; and
the risks of potential disputes concerning indemnities and other obligations that could result
in substantial costs.
Delays or unexpected difficulties or additional costs in the integration process could have a
material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Even if we
are able to integrate the WildBlue business or any future acquisition successfully, this
integration may not result in the realization of the full benefits of synergies, cost savings,
revenue enhancements, growth, operational efficiencies and other benefits that we expect. We cannot
assure you that we will successfully integrate the WildBlue business or any future acquisition with
our business or achieve the desired benefits from the WildBlue or any future acquisition within a
reasonable period of time or at all.
Furthermore, to complete future acquisitions we may issue equity securities, incur debt,
assume contingent liabilities or have amortization expenses and write-downs of acquired assets,
which could cause our earnings per share to decline. We face the risk that the returns on
acquisitions will not support the expenditures or indebtedness incurred to acquire such businesses
or the capital expenditures needed to develop such businesses. Mergers and acquisitions are
inherently risky and subject to many factors outside of our control, and we cannot be certain that
our previous or future acquisitions will be successful and will not materially adversely affect our
business, operating results or financial condition. We do not know whether we will be able to
successfully integrate the businesses, products, technologies or personnel that we might acquire in
the future or that any strategic investments we make will meet our financial or other investment
objectives. Any failure to do so could seriously harm our business, financial condition and results
of operations.
The WildBlue Business Has a History of Losses and May Continue to Experience Losses in the Future
WildBlue experienced net losses of $28.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2009
and $80.6 million, $126.9 million and $115.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007
and 2006, respectively. We cannot assure you that the WildBlue business will generate net income in
the future on a consistent basis or at all. We cannot estimate with any certainty whether demand
for our broadband satellite services will be sufficient for us to maintain or increase the number
of WildBlue subscribers. If the WildBlue business fails to achieve profitability, that failure
could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition
and results of operations.
48
Changes in the Regulatory Environment Could Have a Material Adverse Impact on Our Competitive
Position, Growth and Financial Performance
The provision of communications services is highly regulated. Our business is subject to the
regulatory authority of the jurisdictions in which we operate, including the United States and
other jurisdictions around the world. Those authorities regulate, among other things, the launch
and operation of satellites, the use of radio spectrum, the licensing of earth stations and other
radio transmitters, the provision of communications services, and the design, manufacture and
marketing of communications systems and networking infrastructure. Failure to comply with
applicable laws or regulations could result in the imposition of financial penalties against us,
the adverse modification or cancellation of required authorizations, or other material adverse
actions.
Laws and regulations affecting the communications industry are subject to change in response to
industry developments, new technology, and political considerations. Legislators and regulatory
authorities in various countries are considering, and may in the future adopt, new laws, policies
and regulations, as well as changes to existing regulations, regarding a variety of matters that
could, directly or indirectly, affect our operations or the operations of our distribution
partners, and increase the cost of providing our products and services. These changes could
materially harm our business by (1) affecting our ability to obtain or retain required governmental
authorizations, (2) restricting our ability to provide certain products or services, (3)
restricting development efforts by us and our customers, (4) making our current products and
services less attractive or obsolete, (5) increasing our operational costs, or (6) making it easier
or less expensive for our competitors to compete with us. Changes in, or our failure to comply
with, applicable regulations could materially harm our business and impair the value of our common
stock.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
On December 1, 2009, we issued 10,000 shares of ViaSat common stock to AtContact
Communications, LLC for total consideration of $0.3 million in connection with various consulting and other agreements. The issuance of
common stock was exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933 pursuant
to Section 4(2) thereof.
Item 6. Exhibits
The Exhibit Index on page 51 is incorporated herein by reference as the list of exhibits
required as part of this Quarterly Report.
49
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
|
|
|
|
February 10, 2010 |
VIASAT, INC.
|
|
|
/s/ Mark D. Dankberg
|
|
|
Mark D. Dankberg |
|
|
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald G. Wangerin
|
|
|
Ronald G. Wangerin |
|
|
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
|
50
EXHIBIT INDEX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Incorporated by Reference |
|
|
Exhibit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filed |
Number |
|
Exhibit Description |
|
Form |
|
File No. |
|
Exhibit |
|
Filing Date |
|
Herewith |
|
4.1
|
|
Indenture, dated as of
October 22, 2009, among
ViaSat, Inc., ViaSat
Credit Corp., Enerdyne
Technologies, Inc.,
ViaSat Satellite
Ventures, LLC, VSV I
Holdings, LLC, VSV II
Holdings, LLC, ViaSat
Satellite Ventures U.S.
I, LLC, ViaSat
Satellite Ventures U.S.
II, LLC and Wilmington
Trust FSB, as trustee
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-21767
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
10/22/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.2
|
|
Form of 8.875% Senior
Note of ViaSat, Inc.
due 2016 (attached as
Exhibit A to the
Indenture filed as
Exhibit 4.1 hereto)
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-21767
|
|
|
4.1 |
|
|
10/22/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.3
|
|
Registration Rights
Agreement, dated as of
October 22, 2009, among
ViaSat, Inc., ViaSat
Credit Corp., Enerdyne
Technologies, Inc.,
ViaSat Satellite
Ventures, LLC, VSV I
Holdings, LLC, VSV II
Holdings, LLC, ViaSat
Satellite Ventures U.S.
I, LLC, ViaSat
Satellite Ventures U.S.
II, LLC, J.P. Morgan
Securities Inc., Banc
of America Securities
LLC, Wells Fargo
Securities, LLC,
Oppenheimer & Co. Inc.
and Stephens Inc.
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-21767
|
|
|
4.2 |
|
|
10/22/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.4
|
|
Registration Right
Agreement, dated as of
December 15, 2009,
among ViaSat, Inc. and
the selling
stockholders
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-21767
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
12/18/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.1
|
|
Second Amendment to
Fourth Amended and
Restated Revolving Loan
Agreement, dated as of
October 6, 2009, by and
among ViaSat, Inc.,
Banc of America
Securities LLC, Bank of
America, N.A., JPMorgan
Chase Bank, N.A., Union
Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo
Bank, National
Association and other
lenders party thereto
|
|
8-K
|
|
000-21767
|
|
|
10.1 |
|
|
10/9/2009 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10.2
|
|
Letter agreement dated as of December 14, 2009, by and among ViaSat, Inc.,
Union Bank, N.A., and the other lenders party thereto
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.1
|
|
Certification of Chief
Executive Officer
Pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31.2
|
|
Certification of Chief
Financial Officer
Pursuant to Section 302
of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
32.1
|
|
Certifications Pursuant
to 18 U.S.C. Section
1350, as Adopted
Pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
X |
51
exv10w2
Exhibit 10.2
December 14, 2009
ViaSat, Inc.
6155 El Camino Real
Carlsbad, CA 92009
Attention: Paul Konopka, Esq.
Re: WildBlue Acquisition/Calculation of EBITDA Third Amendment
Gentlemen:
We refer to that certain Fourth Amended and Restated Revolving Loan Agreement dated as of July
1, 2009 among ViaSat, Inc., a Delaware corporation (the Borrower), each lender from time to time
party thereto, Union Bank, N.A., as Administrative Agent (in such capacity, Administrative
Agent), Bank of America, N.A., as Syndication Agent, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Documentation
Agent, Banc of America Securities LLC and Union Bank, N.A., as Joint Lead Arrangers and Joint Book
Runners and Union Bank, N.A., as Collateral Agent, as amended (the Credit Agreement).
Capitalized terms used herein and not defined shall have the meanings assigned to them in the
Credit Agreement. Reference is also made to the WildBlue Acquisition.
The Borrower, the Lenders and the Agents hereby agree, effective as of the date first set
forth above and for all periods ending on or after such date, that the definition of EBITDA
contained in Section 1.1 of the Credit Agreement is amended as follows:
(a) the word and at the end of clause (b)(v) is deleted; and new clauses (vii) and
(viii) are added immediately after the phrase statement of operations, to read as follows:
(vii) non-recurring expenses for professional services, regulatory clearances and
filings, transfer fees, severance payments and other similar closing costs (to the extent
such expenses are not capitalized by the Borrower) incurred in connection with the WildBlue
Acquisition, provided that such non-recurring expenses shall not exceed an aggregate amount
of $27,500,000; and (viii) non-recurring expenses for professional services, regulatory
clearances and filings, transfer fees, severance payments and other similar closing costs
(to the extent such expenses are not capitalized by the Borrower) incurred in connection
with Permitted Acquisitions (other than the WildBlue Acquisition) and reasonably approved by
the Administrative Agent; and
(b) the following sentence is added to the end of such definition:
For the avoidance of doubt, for purposes of calculating EBITDA with respect to any
period in which the WildBlue Acquisition occurred, such Acquisition shall be deemed to have
occurred on the first day of such period. Accordingly, as to any such period Net Income,
Interest Expense, expense for taxes paid or accrued and each other component contained in
the definition of EBITDA shall be deemed to include the actual results of WildBlue on a
pro forma consolidated basis with the Borrower as if such Acquisition had occurred on the
first day of such period.
The governing law and venue provisions of Section 11.17 of the Credit Agreement are
incorporated herein by this reference mutatis mutandis. This letter amendment may be executed in
two or more counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original, but all of which together
shall constitute one instrument. Delivery of an executed counterpart hereof by facsimile or
electronic transmission shall be effective as delivery of a manually executed counterpart. Except
as amended hereby, all of the provisions of the Credit Agreement and the other Loan Documents shall
remain unmodified and in full force and effect except that each reference to the Agreement, or
words of like import in any Loan Document, shall mean and be a reference to the Credit Agreement as
amended hereby. This letter amendment shall be deemed a Loan Document as defined in the Credit
Agreement.
- 2 -
If you are in agreement with the foregoing, please execute this letter is the space provided
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Very truly yours, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
UNION BANK, N.A., |
|
|
|
|
as Administrative Agent and as a Lender |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Mark Adelman |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name:
|
|
Mark Adelman |
|
|
|
|
Title:
|
|
Vice President |
|
|
Agreed to as of the date first set forth above:
VIASAT,
INC.,
a Delaware corporation
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Keven K. Lippert
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Keven K. Lippert |
|
|
Title: Vice President and Secretary |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bank of America, N.A., |
|
|
as a Lender |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Christopher D. Pannacciulli |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Christopher D. Pannacciulli |
|
|
Title: Senior Vice President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BANK OF THE WEST, |
|
|
as a Lender |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Ed Ong |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Ed Ong |
|
|
Title: Vice President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
California Bank & Trust, |
|
|
as a Lender |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Steve DeLong |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Steve DeLong |
|
|
Title: Senior Vice President & Manager |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
COMERICA BANK, |
|
|
as a Lender |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Steve D. Clear |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Steve D. Clear |
|
|
Title: Vice President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., |
|
|
as a Lender |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Anna C. Ruiz |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Anna C. Ruiz |
|
|
Title: Vice President |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, |
|
|
as a Lender |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
By:
|
|
/s/ Donald S. Green |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Name: Donald S. Green |
|
|
Title: Vice President |
|
|
exv31w1
Exhibit 31.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Mark D. Dankberg, Chief Executive Officer of ViaSat, Inc., certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ViaSat, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
Date: February 10, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark D. Dankberg
|
|
|
Mark D. Dankberg |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
exv31w2
Exhibit 31.2
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER PURSUANT
TO SECTION 302 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
I, Ronald G. Wangerin, Chief Financial Officer of ViaSat, Inc., certify that:
1. |
|
I have reviewed this quarterly report on Form 10-Q of ViaSat, Inc.; |
|
2. |
|
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any untrue statement of a material fact
or omit to state a material fact necessary to make the statements made, in light of the
circumstances under which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
3. |
|
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and other financial information included in
this report, fairly present in all material respects the financial condition, results of
operations and cash flows of the registrant as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
4. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I are responsible for establishing and
maintaining disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and
15d-15(e)) and internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f)) for the registrant and have: |
|
a) |
|
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or caused such disclosure
controls and procedures to be designed under our supervision, to ensure that material
information relating to the registrant, including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made
known to us by others within those entities, particularly during the period in which
this report is being prepared; |
|
|
b) |
|
Designed such internal control over financial reporting, or caused such internal
control over financial reporting to be designed under our supervision, to provide
reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles; |
|
|
c) |
|
Evaluated the effectiveness of the registrants disclosure controls and
procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about the effectiveness of the
disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end of the period covered by this report
based on such evaluation; and |
|
|
d) |
|
Disclosed in this report any change in the registrants internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the registrants most recent fiscal quarter
(the registrants fourth fiscal quarter in the case of an annual report) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the registrants
internal control over financial reporting; and |
5. |
|
The registrants other certifying officer(s) and I have disclosed, based on our most recent
evaluation of internal control over financial reporting, to the registrants auditors and the
audit committee of the registrants board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
a) |
|
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in the design or operation
of internal control over financial reporting which are reasonably likely to adversely
affect the registrants ability to record, process, summarize and report financial
information; and |
|
|
b) |
|
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves management or other employees
who have a significant role in the registrants internal control over financial
reporting. |
Date: February 10, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald G. Wangerin
|
|
|
Ronald G. Wangerin |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
exv32w1
Exhibit 32.1
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002, the undersigned officer of ViaSat, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such officers
knowledge, that:
(a) the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended January 1, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: February 10, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Mark D. Dankberg
|
|
|
Mark D. Dankberg |
|
|
Chief Executive Officer |
|
|
CERTIFICATION OF CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002, the undersigned officer of ViaSat, Inc. (the Company) hereby certifies, to such
officers knowledge, that:
(a) the accompanying quarterly report on Form 10-Q of the Company for the quarterly period
ended January 1, 2010 (the Report) fully complies with the requirements of Section 13(a) or
Section 15(d), as applicable, of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and
(b) the information contained in the Report fairly presents, in all material respects, the
financial condition and results of operations of the Company.
Dated: February 10, 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald G. Wangerin
|
|
|
Ronald G. Wangerin |
|
|
Chief Financial Officer |
|
|